Heh, yeah, I suppose a 19 hours difference is more or less simultaneous around here, isn't it?
I'm not really convinced, though: It's really hard to avoid parroting someone when your reason for voting them is exactly the same as theirs. You might as well just say "I'm voting you, for reasons: see above posts" or something, which looks slightly better I guess? I don't see it as being a big deal, either, as we're still a couple of days from the vote deadline. It's a far shot from a bandwagon-impulse-lynch or anything, if you consider 2 votes to be a bandwagon.
Anyway,
Dariush, it was a fair point that Pandarsenic brought up: Why so antsy to lynch? It doesn't even seem like a mislynch would bother you, as long as someone gets lynched today. It's fine for you to have your own suspicions against logismo, but don't deflect the point entirely. Acknowledge it, because when you originally made the statement, you didn't have any solid suspects, effectively making the chance for a mislynch like 7/9 or something, which isn't very good odds at all.
So, are we going spend time until monday randomvoting and unvoting and let the scum kill one of us, repeat ad infinitum? We should start with someone. And by 'someone' I do NOT mean 'no one'.
Trying to rally for a lynch without worrying about mislynching and without sharing your own suspicions and thoughts seems really scummy, and, sure, you found a suspect, but it was after the original statement. Please justify the original statement or I will feel inclined to switch my vote to you as well.