What points? There are no points. So far the only point I've seen is "anybody who helps the town can't be scum!", which is so wrong it's not even funny.
Afraid to vote, I see. Why might that be? If I'm so scummy, why not vote me? If Jetsquirrel is so much scummier, why not vote him?
More like 'anybody who helps town has a better chance of being town than scum.'
The question we need to ask is: Why are you so defensive of blue? Why are you reacting so violently to anyone attacking your precious blue school?
At least I have suspicions, you hypocrite. You're not voting anyone either. You're too defensive. I wasn't sure about either of you before this post, but now I think we can say you're scum, Mr. Person. Good job making up my mind.
All I'm saying is that either the blue or green sorcerer could be scum. Everything's still on the table, nothing's been confirmed yet.
I could turn this around and ask why you're so defensive of the green sorcerer, but I won't since that'd be a waste of time. What the sorcerers did/do is irrelevant. It's far more important who the actual sorcerers ARE and what they've done during the day. I operate under the assumption that night actions are only relevant if they clear a townie or catch scum. That's just how I operate. If you really, really want to drink wine, I'm not going to stop you, but I've really got to recommend against it.
Good job avoiding answering my question. Why didn't you vote for me or Jetsquirrel before? And why are you voting for me now, anyways? Because I'm not voting? I'm not voting anyone because I've still got no suspicions worth voting for.
Yes, it doesn't matter what the sorcerers do, doesn't it? Who cares if the scum sorcerer gets a powerful spell? I'm not defending the green sorcerer, he still could be scum, however, I think it more likely that the blue school is scum.
I didn't vote you or Jet because I didn't feel that strongly about either of you. Now I feel strongly enough to vote you.
Mind coming here Jokerman-exe?, you dropped your vote with little evidence against me and started lurking.
lolOMGUS.
If that you = mr.person then ignore this piece of text as i dont know who he is mentioning besides me.
You have posted in the first quote your 2 top picks and then all of a sudden you drop it all and go vote for mr.person. With no Evidencial backup from your side, so it looks like you are just going for an easier target. with your scumbuddy IronyOwl, he makes the solid statements and you join him in with weak questions.
Blatantly defending Mr Person much?
I find amusing how your chosen scumteam is the two people who are attacking you and Mr Person. That is the weakest chainsaw I've ever seen.
Unvote
I simply havent had enough time on the computer for the last couple of days to post and read this thread, so ive been lurking. And as such i don't think i will be able to read the tread and vote on what has been revealed today.
The day ends in a couple hours. Why didn't you ask for an assist, lemon10?
Yes let's vote the lurker with a real excuse, so we don't actually have to scumhunt. That'll obviously help.
Actually, to use the proper term, lemon would be a flaker, right?
Anyway, I think he's telling the truth, however unacceptable his absence may be.
No no, I never said lurking was scummy. I was merely pointing out a distinct lack of posts. Just a request of action, that's all. Believe me, I know what it's like to accidentally miss a day then get yelled at. I'm just saying I wish to hear more from a few people who haven't posted much. If I thought somebody was scummy for lurking, I'd be voting that player.
I apparently did miss a post by you, Jokerman. My read-through must be significantly worse than I was giving it credit for being. I guess it's time to reread the thread. That's going to suck. The worst part is I'll probably finish it just as the day ends tomorrow. Oh well, it's not time sensitive. Either I'll be dead or I won't, but either way I'll be holding onto IronyOwl for bullshit reasoning for voting me.
Yes, anyone who disagrees with you
obviously has bullshit reasons. Duh.
Yes. Your readthrough has, frankly, been atrocious. You've been missing all sorts of relevant details. Especially ones that incriminate you. Selective reading, perhaps?
@IronyOwl: There's no such thing as OMGUS. What you're looking for is "reasonless vote", and I've stated my reason for voting you. If you want to come forward with something I've done that's actually scummy, that'd be great, but I seriously doubt any such thing exists.
You pretty much just defined an OMGUS. It's a vote whose only reason is that the person you're voting voted you.
You didn't just seriously say you haven't done anything scummy, right? Maybe you should read through the thread closer because you've done quite a few.
If you thought about your attack of not liking my scumhunting style, you'd realize that's how I fucking scumhunt. It's a nulltell. All you've got are nulltells but oh no, you want to go on the lynch wagon. Fuck you.
Okay, it's how you scumhunt. How is this different from policy lynching Org, then? You're being absolutely worthless when I know you don't have to be, so I'm going to lynch you. If you're scum, hurray! If you're not scum, hopefully you'll learn to be worth a damn.
It's not any different from policy lynching Org, which we've all agree'd is a bad idea. So why are you trying to push a policy lynch on me? If I'm doing anything abnormal, please say so. If all you've got is what I normally do and you don't like it, well, that's not my problem.
Yes, but we're lynching you on a combination of being useless
this particular game, and you acting scummy. It looks to me like you're trying to 'work with us' in this post. That, my friend, is a scumtell.
I'm a nice guy, I was giving them all time to post. It really pisses me off when people complain I'm not posting when I either haven't been physically able to post or there's still time left for me to post. It's really fucking annoying when both are true. So I try and avoid being "that guy", but at this point, it's gotten a touch silly how little lemon and Toaster have posted.
In hindsight, prodding the lurkers yesterday would of been a good idea. Oh well, what's past is done. I'd like to hear lemon's thoughts tomorrow and I'd really like to know why he didn't call for an extension. I'm also interested in what exactly Jokerman means by "deflection". I don't get what's scummy about pointing out what the other players are doing.
He probably didn't call for an extension because he's new, and probably didn't even know he could.
HOW can you not see what jokerman means by deflection. He means you attempted to deflect suspicion from yourself by pointing at the other players and not answering the points against you.
Mod: You seem to have missed my vote on Mr Person.
Mr Person: Still haven't seem any scumhunting from you. No pressure at all. If that isn't scummy, then I don't know what is.