Ahh, finally we discuss issues instead of racing in circles debating philosophy. This is what intelligent debate looks like. It's a first for me.
As for schooling/Healthcare I believe that since humans are always shafting each other due to their lack of morals a two tiered system would likely be the best solution here. That is, peoplle may choose to pay for private srivces or, if unable to, use the public ones available to all. To those Canadians here looking for an example look at the premier of Newfoundland, Danny Williams. He is a millionaire and he paid a US hospital to preform open heart surgery upon him, despite there being free healthcare available in all Canadian provinces.
As per governmnet regulation in general I feel it should act to enable private enterprises to operate in the most efficient manner possible (with the fewest direct requirements). IE: Build roads, nuclear power plants and depreciate the value of your currency to make it less expensive to have a business in your area. Therefore businesses would comme and set up factories, leading to more jobs, leading to a more prosperous community, leading to more consumption. then more factories open near you to reduce shipping costs, etc. etc. hopefully causing ecxonomic prosperity.
And then there are unions. Contrary to what you may expect viewing the connotations surrounding objectivism, I support the right to be in a union. However you should also have the right not to be in a union if you do not wish to. Unions are the primary tool of the worker to ensure that corporations treat them with respect. That is the purpose of unions to ensure their members are protected from corporate assholery. However, I am very upset when unions delve into political matters. That is not why workers pay union dues, they pay them to ensure they are adequetly represented to their employer, not to fund blockade runners headed to Gaza.