"If you poke a potato bug hard enough, will it not roll up? If you enrage a soldier ant will it not bite back?If you Provoke bees nest will they not sting away? You only need to see one ants actions to predict their actions. But how many bees will it take for you to be satisfied that they will defend their nest? If you study 12 lizards wont you be able to determine their actions? How many Chickens must you know untill they no longer no longer statistically surprise you? 50?, how many horses must you experience before you know how to get them to do what you want? 100? Penguins seems complex with their own personalities but how many do you think it would take for you to learn about before you could learn their ways? 1000? Dogs have their own personalities, but they are all trained one way, however many thousands dogs exist they all respond the same ways, They exist and they can be trained and molded to do whatever comes naturally, its all cause and effect. Did the gods not make us out of the same matter as the animals, we are only more complex, People can be trained with cause and effect same as any being. Just because you cannot comprehend the complexities of the dwarven mind does not mean it it is fuelled by magic and violates causality. Water cooled far enough, HAS TO freeze, A pillar unsuppored HAS TO fall down, A Convict Lobotomised HAS TO be passive, An Convict castrated will no longer feel lust. Dogs have been BRED to be our servants, Chickens are BRED to lay more eggs, Horses are BRED for speed, Warriors are BRED to be more savage. To Throw away all evidence and claims its a magical choice that violates the course of nature is to wallow in ignorace and denial. We are part of the natural world after all. you cannot choose to be or do something you would otherwise not be/do."
"Ah, but wherein lies the difference between 'can't' and 'won't'? Is there such a difference?
If so, why does it matter for one whose answer will always be the same? If not, wherein lies the need to make a distinction? If nothing is responsible for itself, then nothing is in a position to change, and there remains no reason to fathom such a concept. Why, then, is there any reason to give it a name? If all is hot, there is no cold; if all is predetermined, there is no irresponsibility. To say that no creature can truly be held accountable for its actions is to say that
all creatures must be held accountable for their actions, as surely as to say there is no such thing as wealth is to admit there can be no such thing as debt."