Well.
I guess Pandar might be a dopp. Not too sure.
Zathras, as stated, is probably an alien.
I'm gonna go sleep.
... How is that a MIGHT? No, seriously, how? And you wonder why people aren't buying your electricity excuse.
JTF: You claimed Mad Scientist. Don't those have mind shields? Would a mind shield prevent the block from getting to you? Also, you make a fair point about PMs, I will consider it.
Others that have recommended I go with the volunteers: I hear you, but I would feel more comfortable if there were more than two to choose from, one of whom may have a mindshield. Does anyone else wish to volunteer?
Webadict:
[About Zathras] He's lying because he didn't bring this up when the Day started, which any Town-aligned player would've.
No, I was unsure about claiming, since if I could get him lynched without claiming, I wouldn't have to paint me as a target for the scum to kill. So I voted him and badgered him to answer questions; when he didn't, and it was clear I wouldn't have the time to press him until he cracked, I decided to claim the block. It was still pretty damned early in the day, though, wasn't it? I was in my second or third post of the day.
Okay, but that's a really anti-Town thing to do, don't you think? You have knowledge that could lead to a successful lynch, but you don't want to share it? Because you don't want to make yourself a target? You know what that sounds like to me? "I want to survive!" You're putting yourself ahead of the town.
I don't care if you don't want to draw a target on yourself. I want you to draw a target on potential scum. If you feel that your own survival is more important, then you're not trying to help us win.
Look back at Zathras. He's made several mentions to lurkers and gone after them. He's even gone so far as to use the LurkerTracker several times in order to back up his calling them out. Yes, Janus, they do need to play, but he's gone solely after them using their lurking as an excuse.
You are wilfully misrepresenting the facts: I spent the whole day one voting YOU, not lurkers. I've spent the whole day two voting Pandar, not lurkers, and fencing with Jim/JTF/etc. You are outright lying when you say I've "gone solely after them", and you know it. You know what liars are: scum.
You were going after me because I was "lurking." At least admit it. Now that I'm no longer busy, you can't even find a real target, so you're sticking with your lurker target. I mean, you say I'm lying, but it's true. You don't have any evidence on me, while I, on the other hand, have shown you to be an anti-Town scumbag Exterminator.
I mean, you know what anti-towners are: scum.
In fact, since one vote less for Pandar won't make a difference: Unvote Pandar, Vote Webadict. You are scum.
About the LurkerTracker, well, it's cool, and useful, so why not? Also, I'll post one more before the end of the day. I know I posted one just recently, but the new features are too cool not to try them with real data.
Leafsnail: Please restate your case on Janus. Your Kamina case is clear enough, but your Janus case is murky.
Well, basically: active lurking. If you look at most of his posts, you get a lot of text, a lot of lurker analysis, and a few questions, but basically no accusations. Then there's yesterday, when he voted based on what appeared to be policy (he later denied it) and FoS'd a bunch of lurkers. Attacking lurkers and lynching idiots is not going to win us the game.
Basically, he looks like scum who wants to avoid the bad parts of lurking (specifically, being lynched for it) while keeping the good parts (generally avoiding connections with other mafia members, not attracting much scrutiny).
Leafsnail: isn't this just as true, if not more so, of Webadict than of Janus?
Forgot to add: Webadict: if I block you tonight, will you admit it to the thread?
Of course. I have nothing to hide. Are you planning on killing me tonight?
Whoever he blocks is actually irrelevant. He has to block somebody different Night 3, so blocking an Extie buddy only works once.
Touche. I was really hoping that we could figure that part out by tomorrow.
Mm, right - if the lack of chains is a flavor error he'll still need to block twice more to be certain, though, so we know he didn't somehow pick his Exterminator even by chance.
He should block you then JTF in succession then. Or the other.
And you're explaining because I'm procrastinating on a midterm paper.
Couldn't you ask if it's a flavor error? I mean, if you're going to make us WIFOM ourselves, you could at least put some effort into it.