And then there were three. Personal attacks and lemony-flavored vitriol. Oh good.
You're completely overlooking my actual attacks and points I've made.
I was determining if I thought IronyOwl was scum or town. It worked.
Saying someone is scum without any proof has shown to be the one of the most ineffective tactics in mafia. There's hardly another method that's worked any worse. It simply doesn't work.
Wrong.
Right. I forgot to account for the 20% chance that we win. Unfortunately, I'm not banking on that chance. I'm making sure that there will be a cache of information no matter what case happens.
How am I stopping him exactly? I'm commenting that a particular style of scum hunting is useless and often employed by scum. One often used by ToonyMan, less often (but more relevantly at this point) by Pandarsenic.
You're telling him not to do it. That's an attempt at stopping him. And it's not even anything harmful to the Town, but you're saying that he should stop. Hence, you're attempting to harbor the flow of information.
... That was directed at GlyphGryph. Doesn't really have anything to do with you. Again, pay attention.
I was. I was commenting on several of your comments because you are being scummy in them. I do not believe that anything had to be directed at me to comment on it, or are you still against my opinion? I think all you've done so far is point out that I comment on your style of play and OMGUS people.
Rushing of the game? No. Playing the game? Yes.
It's not my problem if you feel rushed.
I don't feel rushed. I feel like you're rushing. There's a difference, and you know it. I even predict you will take my words out of context again.
Ah. I'm not active now. Shiny.
That was fast. I said you're appearing to be more active. That does not mean you are inactive. It means that you are not as active as you appear. There's several degrees of many things, and there's no need to exaggerate to prove nothing. You're still not addressing the point. You're hiding behind the words.
Sarcasm.
Yes. That was sarcasm. However, this wasn't an answer to the point. It was just stating what it was. That doesn't make the point any less valid. If anything, you're lack of answering makes the attack much more credible, as you are at a loss for an answer.
I did. The point is that you missed who one of the two active players (at that point) was and didn't bother to fix your post. Either you're not paying attention or you made the mistake on purpose.
I am incredibly lazy. That is nothing new. I am also, at times, forgetful. Also not new. I was mixing up GlyphGryph's game with this one. This doesn't mean I'm not paying attention, and there's no reason for me to make a mistake on purpose.
This attack has no point to it. You've established that I made a mistake. I've even established I made a mistake. Now, what is the point? Can you base anything off of it?
He hasn't been vulgar since then. It would be scummier not to back down on that point.
This is perhaps your only redeeming answer from this post. The rest of it has resulted in nothing gained.
Applying pressure to determine alignment... Sounds like the definition of scumhunting.
But, you're not doing it. I feel absolutely no pressure from you. You haven't made an adequate attack. You're not bothering to answer my attacks. You've hardly pointed out any useful information in the entire game. Just because you're voting them, doesn't make it a pressure vote. You have no driving force behind it. You're not going to get me lynched. I know it. You don't have any evidence against me. I am under no pressure from you. You can shout that I am scum because I am scum, but I know I'm not, and that's all there is to it. You can't trick someone into revealing anything if you don't have a means to trick them.
Actually it did. I learned what I wanted about IronyOwl.
I hardly call what you did useful. It was more like you were testing the waters for a lynch. If people joined, you probably would've simply lynched him. If nobody joined, you were going to jump off in favor of someone else. In this case, it was me, probably because I attacked you last. Had I not, you probably would've jumped to Pandarsenic.
Too townie? No. "Voice of reason"? yes.
I see. So, the quotes are supposed to explain your points for you then? I've got this little idea about you. See, you started the game off loud, in hopes of creating an image of activity for yourself. Since the beginning is all random voting, you can't be called out for anything, so you make fallacious arguments and push them. However, you're also doing this to see if anyone jumps on them. From there, I can see you diverging in two ways:
First Case: if someone votes with you, you'll either continue this line further, have your partner hammer, or jump onto the person that voted with you. Since you have fallacious arguments, it'd be easy to attack anyone that followed you, and even if you made yourself an enemy, your ultimate goal would be to get a lynch in. This involves attacking very fast and seemingly hard against several people, in hopes of getting one of them lynched. You'll also hide behind RVS.
Second Case: if someone doesn't vote the person you're voting for, you'll jump off, claiming to have had some epiphany about their alignment after your attack. You can hide behind this because, of course, it was RVS, and "you didn't have anything better." This means if you do this fast enough, you can jump to someone who will eventually be scummy enough for you. Hence, the whole rushing aspect. So, your goal here is just to jump fast.
You are scum.
Author
Topic: Vengeful Mafia 4 - Game Over - Town Wins (Read 40663 times)