It's a quite disturbing parallel, though I'm too tired at the moment to put it more eloquently. Though of course it's not perfect; the soviets at least had good intentions: they threw out an oppressive monarchy, modernized an agricultural backwater (coming out of a devastating war, no less), weathered another devastating war, and survived the better part of a century despite the best efforts of an established, already industrialized power that
wasn't ravaged by war (and in fact profited immensely from it, in no small part due to government spending on industry to fuel the war effort, and the veteran benefits that gave the returning generation free or cheap housing and a free education, creating a vast middle class out of people who were predominantly poor), in an extremely hostile environment nonetheless. Modern rightists just want to return us to some incoherent vision of the 19th century, blaming every reform and step forward as... not having fixed what it did?
China of course has a much worse record. Under Mao they made themselves as backwards as possible with their shitraking peasant worship, and only modernized when the corrupt leaders realized they
could make even more money if they started making shit for other countries (and, surprisingly, the lot of the average citizen increased a little too, since they couldn't just shove them all onto farms and let them starve to death on account of
not knowing how to farm, and they couldn't have their precious factory slaves dying
too much).