Zathras, cut the crap. Your whole first paragraph is just you trying to seem nice. You used a whole bunch of words and actually said nothing new except you suspect Org with no explanation.
Duh, of course it wasn't new. I said it was repetitive, but since I have not seen interesting reactions, I felt it useful to restate it. Regarding Org, I said earlier that quiet Org is scum Org, and you said (and I agreed) that he's scummy for calling reading into evidence scummy. That was like four posts ago, so I didn't think a recap was needed yet.
Seriously, why do you care so much what I or anybody else thinks of you and why aren't you scumhunting?
I don't give a crap about what you or anybody else thinks of me, I care what people think about who's the scum and which arguments are valid. You call my words nice, while Jim called me noobnuts (or something); I don't give the teeniest flying fuck about either of these. I only care about his, and your, and other's reactions to Jim's scummitude, or other leads. And presenting theories, giving opinions on people's reactions, and asking questions
is scumhunting, dude.
You've got this well-reasoned argument you've made against Jim and now you're just sitting on it for no reason. Instead of pushing Jim to cracking both so you can be sure and to convince everyone else he's scum, you're instead trying to convince everyone else to lynch him based on a theory you have and no other evidence at all.. It's a great theory, but not only is it potentially flawed if the scum decided to try a gambit, it's also based on our trust of you. Let's just say I don't particularly trust you, Zathras.
I quit poking at Jim since he's already said he's not interested in discussing it, so I asked all of you if you were, or other opinions on the night data. I'm already voting
Jim, and assessed his reluctance to discuss this as scummy; there's not much more I can do on that front. But I'm not sitting on it, I'm presenting it at large and asking people to shoot it down, support it, or present alternatives.
As to the last point: I'm not asking you to trust me. I'm asking you for your own interpretation of the night information presented, or to evaluate/reject/whatever mine. At most, I'm asking you to trust my claim that I supported White last night, but even if you don't, it doesn't change much. Does anyone wish to counterclaim that? Did any of you support White last night, branding me a liar?
I'd like to do more scumhunting on other people, but I don't have anything nearly as solid on others yet.
Org, I can't read, but I'm suspicious. You & IronyOwl have been butting heads, but neither has really said anything useful yet (but keep going, something out to come out of it). Eduren and JetSquirrel are too lurky for my tastes, and when they come in, they don't say much either. I've asked all of you questions I can think of, but haven't found anything useful to grasp at yet. It'd be helpful if y'all were more active.
It is important to lynch scum today. So I try to drive a consensus based on the closest we have to "data": the night actions and their preparation yesterday. Other than that, we are down to discussing who's lurking more and how they phrased their answer to a trivial RV question.
Or what do you think,
Person? How should we proceed? Who are your top three scumpicks for now? How about you,
Irony? Or
Eduren & JetSquirrel? Any thoughts or useful scumpicks?