Azure, who do you think is telling me what to do?
Bayer, obviously. Y'know, your scum IC? Oh, and if my initial impression of you taking a bit of scum advice too literally wasn't enough -
Push. Always push.
At least until you're sure the player isn't scum, and then some.
- then you're idea of pushing a player to breaking point to verify their scummitude - a concept far too similar to Bayer's method of play in the last beginner game - cinched it for me. If you're propagating an idea expounded by another player who now happens to be the scum IC, then I'm gonna be pretty bloody suspicious of its origins. >.> Highly speculative, I admit, but coupled with how you've been acting all game it contributes to the slowly mounting pile of evidence that's been gathering against you.
Now, then; moving on to a more interesting post...
Personally, I think defending is a waste of time, but if you so wish.
... O.O
Pahahahahahaa... XD Wow. So you believe in just leaving arguments to fester and gather weight the longer you
completely ignore them? Interesting tactic you've got there. Really seems to be working for you so far.
1: Hell no. I'm not stupid. [undefendable without WIFOM]
Heh... XD That read pretty funny.
Anyway, you've just kicked yourself in the teeth with your own defense here. Hell, if you were an idiot, you would at least have some excuse for following up on my weak attack. But if you're refusing that hypothesis, then you're encouraging me to think that you really are scum that fell into a day 1 trap and don't like it one bit. Smooth, dude.
2: To push, to get a reaction, which I then found scummy. He panicked, look at my previous post.
No, he hadn't panicked. He got annoyed, and appears to be getting progressively more annoyed as the game continues; primarily due to your own pathetic attempts to declare him scum when the evidence mounted against him is decisively less than that gathered against you, even if we exclude the fact that you fell into my gambit. I also find it interesting that you took this moment to completely ignore my point that you're being far,
far too curt in your answers. I take it that's another one of those thigs there's no point in defending, eh? >.>
3: Who is giving advice, and why would I be posting this much, when I could be lurking. [WIFOM again]
Already answered the first part of this. As for the latter... well, that's true. That is a WIFOM question. However, you're attempting to divert the conversation away from what I was talking about. I was pointing out the fact that your answers to most everything thus far has been exceedingly short. Single sentence, in most instances, which I have always found distasteful and disruptive to town affairs in IRC games. It prevents town from gathering the information it sorely needs from every player, and allows scum to blend in uite easily.
However, while you have been active - having responded to every question in a timely manner - you have nonetheless refused to go beyond muttering much more than one sentence, more often than not. That simply isn't a townie attitude.
4:I see no need to tunnel, and usefulness is relative.
Now you're
conflicting with our own advice. You're telling other people to pressure constantly until they have an answer, and then avoid doing exactly that. So, to put it into layman's terms, you're acting in the exact opposite way that you propose regular town should act. The only time you changed your tune was when I set up a potential bandwagon on Elegy, which - in turn - fell flat on its face.
Whoops. >.>
5: And here would belong the meta argument.
Oh, shut up. You haven't refuted a damn thing I've said, and only made yourself look even more scummy in the process.
long post is looooooooooong...
wow, Glenfiddich is fierce. The Scots know their whiskey, even if they're a dour, unclouth lot I can't stand to speak with because I find them incomprehensible...
Oh, also:
Well I was incorrect, there is still Azure.
Still me what? What'chu talkin' 'bout?
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames... (Read 57184 times)