Also, with a country of 1.3 billion people, it's kinda unfair and racist that if some nutjob in a university says something then that's automatically "Indian scientists say ..." Norway is only 5 million people, if one Norwegian academic said something controversial would it be fair to say "Norwegian scientists say ..."? If not, then how is it fair to generalize from one person's beliefs to an entire subcontinent of 1.3 billion individuals?
Tell it to the BBC, who titled the article as such (and then went on to immediately use the term "Indian scientists" to refute the same claims they just attributed to said "Indian scientists").
And while it's fun to sweep it all under the rug as racist generalizations, there really are some glaring issues with parts of the Indian educational system and it doesn't help anyone to pretend that they don't exist. I only got to get a look into elementary level while I was living there and helping the neighborhood kids out with their schoolwork, but judging from what others said about their college/university experiences, it sounded like there was some of the same theme going on there.
There are a great number of exceptional minds coming out of India, but at times it seems they rise to prominence
in spite of the standard Indian educational system (not to mention cultural traditions of looking at such things), not as products of it.
Can't complain about the medical education though, only medical professionals I spoke with there seemed quite competent. Not that I know enough about it to really tell, but at least I wasn't prescribed anything ayurvedic.