Dont be silly, LS.
There are many laws created by the hill that are downright incompatible with each other, which the SCOTUS then has to handwave around. How else do you reconcile
civil forfeiture with the 4th and 6th amendments? (because obviously, those two things only apply to people, and when you bring charges against the property directly, which does not have any rights, you can just pull the functional equivalent of a
cadaver synod on it! Brilliant! -- (EG, "You, Pile of 500 million dollars in unmarked bills! I DEMAND THAT YOU TESTIFY HOW YOU CAME TO BE THE POSSESSION OF THIS MAN! Oh, WONT ANSWER ME WILL YOU!? CONTEMPT OF COURT! TAKE THAT MONEY INTO POLICE CUSTODY!")
At this point they could declare that all parents in the US are horribad, and all children should become wards of the state (For their safety!), where they can be programmed into neofascists away from any source of old-culture-- and probably get away with it.
There is a seriously lopsided position of power with US politics in general at the moment (which is one of the BIG reasons why minority justice is as bad as it is), which leads to continuation of corrupt practices, and inter-agency hand wringing to make it LOOK legit, when it smells to high heaven.
Finally passing ThoughtPolice level laws about race hate buzzwords is very easily in their grasp at the moment. Just that Trump and Co would only ever go down that road if it was to prevent "slander" of the president. (EG, create the legal framework upon which such an attrocity can be laid, by first making it illegal to "Slander" the president, King of Thailand style.) It may sound like paranoia, but really, I dont see it as being out of character with The Donald, and I dont see it being out of character or previous political precidence for the Dems to later pick that festering shit up and use it themselves after King Donald gets dethroned.