desperately enforce western values in, say, nigeria, even when nigerian women have no real interest in it.
A big part of that is class differences. For a poor woman (on the global scale) becoming "emancipated" in the Western sense means basically atomizing society. Atomization works well if you're wealthy and/or have a great welfare safety net. Works like shit if your a poor tribesperson or earning well below US minimum wage and there's no safety net.
Probably also works like shit if you're earning US minimum wage and over, in the USA. How much of the stuff that very wealthy academic feminists focus on actually helps poor women? More women CEOs does sweet fuck all for women on minimum. Not everyone can be the 100% self-actualized characters from Sex and the City. They'd probably argue that more women in the board room sends a signal that opens the way for other women to rise up. Trickle-down feminism is a term that's been used. Help the 1% of the world's richest women and the 99% of other women will naturally rise.
For that matter, paid maternity leave at your
current rate of income only makes sense when the employer needs to pay for it. Trying to put the cost on the taxpayer, but
also keep it as the woman's
current rate of income unfairly funnels more tax money into the pockets of the rich and privileged than it does into the pockets of working class women who need it the most. Someone who is well off might not see a problem here, and list a number of lifestyle reasons why it's fair to give so much money back to the already-wealthy.
Likewise I think the decline of civilizations thing is related to class, not sexual politics. All those historical societies that imploded or were overrun ended up with a decadent upper class who were very inward-looking. Liberal sexual politics could be a symptom of an overly-comfortable pampered elite, and not an actual cause or problem in themselves. e.g. because Western people are a pampered global elite, then they become inward looking, and that includes sexual politics/identity. But it also includes video games. After all, Rome had it's lavish gladiator games as well as decadent orgies. But it would be a poor argument to say that Rome declined
because of decadent orgies. The orgies were a symptom.