I had in mind certain posters on this forum. Who bring up how terrible halal slaughter is and have never once mentioned anything else related to animal welfare. I'm sure they're not the only ones out there. So I'm talking about the anti-halal people specifically, who suddenly discovered animal rights when they realized you could bash muslims with it.
If you're talking about me, I blather on about animal rights (despite the mostly deaf ears of my audience on here) fairly regularly.
I'm a vegetarian. Frankly all cattle farming disgusts me and I would rather see all of it gone, but the idea of halal/kosher butchery just presents wholly unnecessary additional suffering which has no place in the modern day. Then again, if there are horrible cruelties taking place in so-called "modern" abattoirs (I mean, other than the fact that they're killing thousands of purpose-bred creatures to make a fucking
steak ) I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest, given the kind of people who would take on such a job.
In this discussion, however, I based my argument on a hypothetical version of the two butchery methods- how they're intended to be, on paper.
Never once did I say that the way we treat animals in factory farms was okay or acceptable, I merely said that halal is even worse, and unnecessarily so.
If one wanted to simply pick on Islam there are countless other, also-damning facets of the religion to mention.