Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[hector13]

He was being obtuse on the single biggest hot-button issue in internet society. This is what is generally known as "trolling" or "flame-baiting", when it's intentional. When it's unintentional, it's still a problem because then you get actual arguments.

Don't think it's the single biggest issue on 'tinternet.

You should be a red top journo, sensationalizing like that.

[Putnam]

Not biggest issue, biggest hot-button issue. Meaning it's the most prone to causing arguments.

[Loud Whispers]

I can think of more

Which I will not post

[TD1]

Having others argue against your position is not ban-worthy. Intentional flaming, sure. Being the one smashed down - as I'm sure he was, here on Bay12, where I have been called both sexist and racist many times (though mainly by the now-banned) - shouldn't earn a ban in itself.

Combined with other deviant activities, like creepy pictures, or a history of causing, rather than participating in, flamey arguments would be more likely.

[hector13]

I can think of more

Which I will not post

Wtf is this? The shitposter showing restraint?

Where's the real LW and what have you done with him?

[NJW2000]

Certainly the only thing that really ever causes major arguments on this thread, as far as I can see.

[itisnotlogical]

TBH, I will not miss Bohandas. I disagreed with him, but his arguments were simple and one-note as well. Like, Baby's First Rebuttal levels of debate.

Also, I just looked at the moderation log for the first time. So THAT'S what happened to all those names I used to see around here.

[Shadowlord]

Having others argue against your position is not ban-worthy. Intentional flaming, sure. Being the one smashed down - as I'm sure he was, here on Bay12, where I have been called both sexist and racist many times (though mainly by the now-banned) - shouldn't earn a ban in itself.

Combined with other deviant activities, like creepy pictures, or a history of causing, rather than participating in, flamey arguments would be more likely.

Toady didn't delete his posts, so if you want to see for yourself what happened, go back to here: http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=68850.msg6795021#msg6795021

That's where it started. It goes on for quite a few pages. After you see the Spock picture, you'll be almost done - Bohandas makes two more posts on the subject afterwards.

[penguinofhonor]

It took some real internet sleuthing, but I found it.

[Shadowlord]

See, now I'm wondering if you're talking about something I read when it was originally posted, or something I missed.

[Sonlirain]

See, now I'm wondering if you're talking about something I read when it was originally posted, or something I missed.

penguin sent me a PM. It was something about cartoons and love problems.

[Orange Wizard]

It took some real internet sleuthing, but I found it.

share pls

[Xantalos]

Oh that one.

That was him being ... really damn blunt. Wouldn't personally call it creepy, he just didn't give a fuck about what was an acceptable thing to talk about.

[hector13]

It took some real internet sleuthing, but I found it.

share pls

The original post was deleted for a reason!

Broke guidelines. Not much of a big deal, just creepy. If penguin doesn't PM you, I'll send you what they sent me.

[SOLDIER First]

Where even is the moderation log? I can't find it anywhere.
.....Again.