Oh I understand now. In any case the wonders of internet is that when handled ok you can have some degree of anonymity, on the other hand it's really risky to go publishing thoughts that you think can get you in troubles, but at the same time I fully understand the need of lightening the burden.
Still it's something very weird to say at least, to expect some privacy here beyond the courtesy we might offer. If she's really being "watched" or under vigilance or something then you not even need to quote her, hell not even need to be registered on the site. Beyond being weird to expect it, it's simply insane. I hope is not a catchy trend, because then the forum will become really boring.
And finally... on the reggeton ban. Let start by the fact that reggeton is empirically bad, its not a matter of opinion. It should be banned, yes, but not with laws, but with musical education, more values at home and more culture. Banning a type of music (even when that "music" shouldn't even be considered music in the first place) is something really risky. What if tomorrow another politician doesn't like Mozart, Beethoven or Bach? Metallica, Iron Maiden or Pantera? Foo fighters, Interpol or Artic Monkeys? And thus they ban classic music, metal, rock, salsa or anything else?
No, regeeton should be fought against yes, but with education and the not glorification of the "thug lifestyle", not by stupid laws that would set a really bad precedent.