Yeah, but I'd be willing to bet that that didn't have the explicit support of a branch of the UN devoted to human rights.
This is why people don't ratify the UN's human rights
I'm not sure what gets me more about these anti-intellectual hugboxers that pretend to be feminists, the hypocrisy of flipping between "strong independent women" and "spun-glass fragile children women" depending on which narrative suits them, or the way they've slotted so neatly into the existing coalition of conservative fearmongers re: new media and old & meaningless PC idiots. It's like the perfect storm of censorship.
I warned you bro
It keeps happening
It's really weird how some who adopt the progressive label most fervently are so authoritarian, as if freedom of speech is something that can be thrown away in exchange for meaningless rites and rewards
I mean, it's already been repeatedly mentioned, but the statistics they used were heavily manipulated, and they're trivializing real abuse by equating it to having someone disagree with you on the internet! I think the original row about cyberbullying was a tad silly, but at least that was trying to cope with sensitive kids who killed themselves because people harassed them online instead of in person!
Tbh even making a distinction between harassing irl and online was counterproductive, harassment should be harassment
Because unlike societal expectations... Men don't actually have a solution to everything nor do they respond with situations with violence or extreme stoicism. They just believe that men do.
So they cannot ask for help nor can they actually solve their problems. Learned Helplessness.
Who has ever had the option to get solutions from society? No one ever has solutions to problems to start with, if they did they wouldn't be problems
Stoicism is not extreme, it just is - and it's not even as good as just pragmatism and will