I just saw someone sort of defend a movie and it was Star Trek, the new one.
And in many ways I can see where she is coming from. As a movie on its own it is fine and the characters are not meant to be THE characters we know and love but offshoots. Heck I like the movie and I also think it is a good movie. Yet I couldn't grasp what I was getting mad about, as if there was something she was saying that was just inherently wrong.
She spoke about how the movie wasn't made for fans of the original series and that even the creator backlashed against the fandom by saying so.
Then she mentioned Cumberbach in the sequel and I could finally put it together.
---
What I found so wrong was... Star Trek WAS for the original fanbase. It was for everyone who watched the original and loved it.
AT LEAST as far as giving the movie hype.
And that is a trend we see in videogames as well. IPs just taking on the names and guises of the original barely doing them serves with hopes that the community appeal already contained in the fanbase it already has spills over to the casual market.
That is what I find wrong. Star Trek might not have been for "fans of the original" but it needed them, it needed them to be sort of the pawns, its puppets to spread its popularity. It uses their superficial element to draw in the dedicated fanbase to splash it over the people who don't care.
Syndicate, Thief, Xcom Beauro... All games that tried to cash in on its good name.
That is sort of the problem I have in concept...