Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[KingofstarrySkies]

BURN THE HERETIC

[Aptus]

Well. What if someone, god forbid,

likes

math?

Stop spouting such nonsense and go watch more sportsball instead.

_{I kind of like math... at least some kinds of it... like combinatorics.}

[LordSlowpoke]

Well. What if someone, god forbid,

likes

math?

we scoop their brains out and feed it to the great wolfram machine

wolfram could use their mathliking proprties

[pisskop]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMUisbqxc9M#t=89
w.t.f.
that is all.

[Frumple]

Well. What if someone, god forbid,

likes

math?

Well, that's absolutely and perfectly fine, and they're quite welcome to study all they want. Independently. Without the aid of calculators. Abacuses only. hahaha, I'm just kidding those people get sent to the reeducation center
there's only one, because that's all that's needed to service the entire world's population of such blighted minds _{^{this is a joke}}

[AlleeCat]

WHAT. THE. FUCK.

So, the thing about tumblr is that it's populated primarily by whiners, who can and will complain about anything and everything they don't like. You probably shouldn't be surprised about it.
In other words, I should totally make a tumblr where I complain about how racist and homophobic QWERTY keyboards are.

So someone who doesn't like something and actually brings up valid arguments while voicing their opinions on it is a "whiner?"
What does that make someone like you? Someone who doesn't actually have solid arguments and just hates on things for the sake of it, or because it's the popular thing to do? Because that would be my definition of a "whiner."
Give me one good reason why Tumblr is such a bad place, besides the fact that there are people on it with opinions you don't like.

[LordSlowpoke]

* LordSlowpoke rolls eyes

because every single time tumblr was discussed here, it devolved into a confrontational shitfest with people presenting ad hominem as logical argument

take it to irc or pms thank you

[Orange Wizard]

Yeah. I don't want to do this here. PM me if you really want to press it.

[TD1]

Well. What if someone, god forbid,

likes

math?

I'm bad at maths, and I don't want to do the subject at all, but after completing a maths-y thing, I always felt good. Suppose it's the journey that counts, and not the goal? I dunno.

[Sergarr]

Probability is fun~

[pisskop]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1sjHGODFHg
:<

I now have  burning desire to see it.

[10ebbor10]

The years are off by a rather significant margin though. Easily recognized by looking at the Great War (1900-1908) and the Second world war (1950-1958)

[pisskop]

The years are off by a rather significant margin though. Easily recognized by looking at the Great War (1900-1908) and the Second world war (1950-1958)

American's cant see.
:< But if its wrong I care less.

[FearfulJesuit]

A Texas court has gone full retard.

[Lord Shonus]

The ruling isn't as bad as the article's presenting it. The grounds are that the statute is too broad, not that prohibition of certain kinds of photographs is unreasonable.

Attorneys for Thompson said that the statute was “the stuff of Orwellian thought-crime” and that it did not distinguish “upskirt” or “peeping Tom” photography from “merely photographing a girl in a skirt walking down the street”, so in theory it could criminalise the likes of paparazzi journalists.

The appeals judges appeared to agree, stating that although “upskirt” type-images are intolerable invasions of privacy, the wording of the law is too broad. Presiding judge Sharon Keller wrote in the court’s opinion published on Wednesday: “Protecting someone who appears in public from being the object of sexual thoughts seems to be the sort of ‘paternalistic interest in regulating the defendant’s mind’ that the First Amendment was designed to guard against.”

This is nothing more than yet another older law not being up to handling the ubiquity of modern technology. Similar laws have been struck down in other jurisdictions, and the problem was promptly rectified by passing more precisely tailored legislation.