Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Graknorke]

No, they're just maths things. I actually got on a roll with looking at science articles and seeing that for the most part it's Simple English Wikipedia, nothing too sinister there. Until...

Consequently, he was deprived of the observation time at the 200-inch Palomar telescope as these observations do not comport with standard Big Bang cosmology, i.e. with the central preconceived dogma of so called mainstream scientists

Unbiased comment of the year.

Does it ever mention a Biblical and / or Conservative agenda?

Conservapedia, launched on November 21, 2006, is a conservative, family-friendly Wiki encyclopedia.

Rather than claim a neutral point of view and then insert bias, Conservapedia is clear that it seeks to give due credit to conservatism and Christianity.

[LeoLeonardoIII]

That's not an agenda, it's just Truth and Justice. There's a difference, see. If it's your weird stuff you're talking about, you get to say that this is great! (skip to 12:30)

No, they're just maths things. I actually got on a roll with looking at science articles and seeing that for the most part it's Simple English Wikipedia, nothing too sinister there. Until...

Consequently, he was deprived of the observation time at the 200-inch Palomar telescope as these observations do not comport with standard Big Bang cosmology, i.e. with the central preconceived dogma of so called mainstream scientists

Unbiased comment of the year.

At least he used id est correctly. Might be a fluke. Better read his entire catalogue of crazy ramblings to find out!

[Graknorke]

Oh no.
They're saying that the theory of relativity is a liberal fabrication designed to "mislead people in how they view the world". I don't know how much more I can take.
And apparently this is evidence against relativity:

Scientists are unable to explain a June 2012 cluster of earthquakes in Ireland.

Fuck it if I stay awake any more I might do something stupid. And this isn't helping.

Oh no it even has mention of scientist conspiracy theories and coverups rather than accepting the a Christian might have been wrong nope that's it I'm done for real this time.

[LeoLeonardoIII]

Slowly driving people insane since late 2006.

[alexandertnt]

Conservapedia's bible translation project is the best part.

Its exactly what you think it is: Twisting the meaning of Retranslating the bible to remove liberal bias.

[Rose]

Somebody browsed through my youtube account, saw some trackmania relplays I uploaded, and invited me to a private beta test.

[MaximumZero]

Somebody browsed through my youtube account, saw some trackmania relplays I uploaded, and invited me to a private beta test.

Nice.

[Tiruin]

Somebody browsed through my youtube account, saw some trackmania relplays I uploaded, and invited me to a private beta test.

Nice.

When you say browse...
I take it from wording, you didn't know all this happened until much later, right?

[Yoink]

It's ridiculously hot, here. Only 31 degrees according to Google, but humidity makes up the difference.
And of course I have to walk several kilometres for an appointment.  I'm gonna smell freaking AWFUL, and I'm not normally one to care about my body odour.

At least I've made a stop for an iced coffee along the way. Blehh.

[Flying Dice]

Conservapedia's bible translation project is the best part.

Its exactly what you think it is: Twisting the meaning of Retranslating the bible to remove liberal bias.

Such a waste of effort when they could be retranslating Rand's works (though I've heard that Selfish can be difficult to understand for non-native speakers). After all, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged are known for their heavy liberal bias.

[misko27]

Google Docs is trying to correct "force" to "for". Yes force is a word Google, look it up. It's fine if I append "of nature" to it, but force alone simply won't do apparently.

God damn Econazis.

[Xantalos]

How can someone be an econazi? Persecute chihuahuas?

[Elephant Parade]

Google Docs is trying to correct "force" to "for". Yes force is a word Google, look it up. It's fine if I append "of nature" to it, but force alone simply won't do apparently.

God damn Econazis.

A while ago, it decided "foes" wasn't a word. Except that I had already used it twice, and it was fine with those.

[LeoLeonardoIII]

It didn't like the first two foes, was willing to let it pass, but the third foes was just too much.

Too much foes, says it. Too much foes at one times.

[Eric Blank]

Today, I have the urge to scream gibberish at the top of my lungs. I do not know why, and I cannot decide just how I feel about this. But the desire to spout nonsense and possibly slap someone is rising.