As putnam says. Regardless, one is more "manly" by telling societal standards to piss off, not by fellating the memetic phallus of "proper masculine action". What spineless wuss cares two whits what others think of the masculinity of their actions? Assess objects for their cuteness as much as you please. You define manhood by personal action, not by outside assignation. The fool that thinks a man in a dress squeeing over dolls is not a man may have definite proof placed upon their crown and wiggled mightily. Handstands whoresons, there is no escape.
You may flip gender statements as you please. It is a human condition not limited to particular sexes.
It sort of reminds me of an episode of "Cow and Chicken" that I felt was oddly profound in a certain sense.
In it Chicken and his friends were trying to become men... so in a cave the manliest man (his title... though I probably don't remember) is convinced to teach them to be men. So he mades them do crazy things like try to shave with smooth rocks stating that "real men use the smooth ones". He seems crazy but when chicken and his friends wake up they are heavily muscled and hairy.
Yet the next thing they are made to do by their trainer... is have a tea party with Cow and playing with dolls. To the disdain of chicken as his friends.
Now this seems simple but it made me realize one thing: If men are supposed to be so tough to the extent that they will do anything no matter how dangerous or filthy or unpleasant... why is it mutually exclusive to them doing "girly things"? As silly as it is, it was thing that made me realize that what makes a "man" is purely subjective, it is made up... There is no "manly" only a list of traits people associate with it.