Yeah, I've never heard oil referred to as a starch before. Starch is carbohydrate, not lipids. Sure, there are reasons why deep frying is bad, but "more starch" isn't one of them.
Its not like people in a food desert and/or working 60 hours for low income were ever going to eat well in the first place. I'd rather be fat than malnourished.
I feel similar about the hate of "golden rice". Researchers have boosted the amount of beta-carotene in rice kernels (it's normally just in the leaves) to the point that it's a viable boost to vitamin A production in humans, e.g. as a humanitarian thing, since vitamin A deficiency is endemic, and notably, in areas where rice is a staple crop. Making a
better rice is therefore an extremely cost-effective idea at promoting world nutrition.
Meanwhile, Greenpeace and other anti-GMO groups have slammed golden rice saying that a diet rich in green leafy vegetables and fresh fruit provides ample beta-carotene, therefore no money should be spent developing golden rice. Or, they alternatively say that we should ship free vitamin A tablets to
everyone on Earth, and not fuck with the rice. Also, they say that Golden Rice
only fixes the vitamin A problem, not
all problems, therefore it shouldn't be done. Which is a pretty weird argument, since it's literally an argument against ever doing anything.
However, it smacks of a haughty first-world "let them eat cake" attitude: it's not that simple to get fresh fruit and vegetables to literally everyone in the world. And the "vitamin A tablets" idea is ridiculously expensive, distribution would be impractical and need massive amounts of CO2 emissions, and the factories / resources needed to make it would be environmentally disastrous, and in fact
deplete food resources further than they already are. You need to make the supplements
out of food. What do those fucking idiots
think that vitamin A supplement tablets are
made out of, if it's not food with vitamin A precursors? Clearly, just shipping tablets around is a bullshit solution, because it only ever solves the problem short-term and you need to maintain it, while the Golden Rice idea is self-sustaining, and can be grown anywhere normal rice can grow, e.g. it's distributed/decentralized.
So, they
know that the alternatives they are proposing would actually be more environmentally damaging and costly than Golden Rice, their only goal is to
shut down the program, and they don't actually give a fuck about fixing the malnutrition problem at all.