There's one I forgot, the Blue Eyes / Brown Eyes experiment. Divide a class (of the same race) into blue eye and brown eye groups. Give a bunch of privileges to one, and disadvantages to the other, while claiming one group is better than the other. They start to act like racially segregated groups with indoctrinated racism, literally almost instantly.
The next day, the teacher reversed the entire segregation / superiority thing. Doing the same test, the "superior" group massively out performed the "inferior" group each day. So whoever was billed as "superior" on each day flip-flopped on academic achievement tests. So it' easy to set this stuff up, and you can reverse the entire discrimination almost immediately. Obviously, these are short-term effects if there's no reinforcement, but you can get kids bullying each other as "brown eyes" and flunking tests merely because they've been told they're part of an "inferior" group almost immediately.
Heh, I remember these.
Note that the experiment in question had pupils and children as the sample population, or at least the one I know of, which led to further study and research, noting down that these attitudes of superiority and such are predominantly behavioral (as in they're learned).
...I know there's a video of this out there. >_>
I made that point because all these experiments have involved regular middle-class people. There's a view that the educated middle class would somehow not fall into this stuff, but they do.
Of course normal working class people aren't excessively fascist, but there's a view that their support based fundamentally comes from the working class. The psych experiments prove that this is false, and the sort of Lord of the Flies behavior is common to all social classes. "Social norms" of polite society completely collapsed within 72 hours in both Stanford and Third Wave, and the participants started to strongly resemble abusive prison guards in one, and Hitler Youth, in the other.
Stanford's experiment was pretty flawed though in several factors ._. (that of which not excluding examining the participant's own ways of behaving), and criticized in many fronts. Though, it's of note--there's no distinctness of one being innately a bad person, but their behavior.
Which is why those commonalities are seen in all social 'classes', because it's not inherent of social classes, but rather the behavior by which each individual both interacts with and creates a culture of their group and especially
with and onto other people.
And this is muchly noted in studies proceeding after those experiments which are of many variants that I'm forgetting directly because of resting post-Finals.
Woke up today in a
strange mood and saw a tiny speck hover in front of my right eye, before slowly descending after a few seconds. Noticing several things that told me it wasn't a speck of dust, I then saw it sway and squiggle a bit. It was something alive.
Huh, tiny spider.
Oh good morning there little one.
Wow, you're really close to me.
So that's how those tiny millimeter spiders look like all close up!
Oooo, look at that shiny webbing.
Wow that's so close to my eye.
I wish my hair was longer :I
I feel like it's 8:40 am (It was actually 8:38, so yay body clock!)
So I took my finger and displaced its webbing and put it on our plants outside.
Tiny, light-yellow thing. ._.