No numbers on vertical axis... But there are lines! This is used in an opinion piece on SciAm which claims that Moore's Law isn't dead, and uses this chart as proof.
Also the horizontal axis (and presumably any conclusions one might draw from the nice straight line) is fucked: the first set of years is about 15 years. The second set is about 10 years. The third, the "Moore's Law Era," is about 60 years. It's about equal in width to the first two sets of years. As you can see, the line and the dots on the graph somehow maintain a nice straight trajectory in passing through all three, despite the obvious time fuckery making it clear that the line could not possibly actually be anything close to a single straight line...
If you do find and read the article, just FYI, I stopped reading partway through, right around the time I reached that image and concluded that it was bullshit. (If you really want to read it,
it is here)
(The article's chief claim appears to be "While the rate of decrease in the cost per transistor inevitably slows from the 30% per year historical rate as the total accumulated volume becomes very large, nature (or at the very least, history) tells us that the cost reduction must still be achieved but possibly by different means", so if that makes any sense to anyone, please, enlighten me)