No, man, kick a puppy! Puppies suck! Kittens are good for huffing. Puppies, not so much. So Pandar, after two games as town, it's about the right time for you to roll scum, yes?
And Gambler's Falacy number two... Interesting.
And another humourless git without an opinion on the important puppy vs. kitten question. Bah.
Add that to the fact that you've now evenly targeted all four non-you players (Gambler's on Toony and Pandar, opening RV on me, Walamaloo on Archangel) is making you look somewhat suspicious.
Are you srsly going to try Gambler's Fallacy on me? Srsly?
Eh, good point. Still, while I have unlimited faith in the Cosmic Equivalence Principle and the laws of Statistics, and I know intellectually that coins have no memory... if it lands ten tails in a row, I can't help but bet heads for the next flip. I know it's still 50-50, but can't help it...
It's actually 40-60 for being scum so not even a coin flip... And I like how you backed down immediately when called on the Fallacy.
a) I asked a question (good or not) of everybody because I want to get everyone talking. Duh. I'm not trying to get reads on
one person, I'm tried to get reads on
four, so, four questions. Lame ones, sure, but got
something out of everyone, which is good.
b) I backed down from the Gambler's Fallacy, because it was, indeed, a fallacious argument, which I didn't notice when I made the previous off-the-cuff comment.
c) The 50-50 coinflip is the canonical example of the fallacy, and the source of my remark. Even after ten tails in a row, the chances of head/tails on the eleventh are 50-50, but psychologically, one tends to bet heads. Coins have no memory, but we do, and let ourselves be carried away by it sometimes.
I still want to hear JTF's answer to my RV question
So you've voted me twice now. Why?
Not twice, just the once, and one reminder. I generally continue to colour my current target red (and my FoS target blue, hence ToonyMan's "you've FoS'd me twice"; no I didn't, same argument). This so people remember they are being voted/FoS'd even if I don't make "grrr answer my question dammit!!1!" posts, or no votecount posts are visible. You've answered my questions for now, so I
unvote you (twice if you wish:
unvote).
What you've done so far, it's pretty anti-town to me. You find every person in this game scummy before its hardly started (sooper defensive) and now you're being a hypocrite.
Was that addressed to me or JTF? If to me: you lie. Only you I've called outright scummy (well, I did ask Pandar if it was time he rolled it). Everyone else, just random questions in RVS. I don't think I'm being particularly defensive, and I
certainly don't see any hypocrisy in my posts.
By the way, you didn't answer my previous question: why are you voting me without either evidence or questions? I find your vote suspicious, and reeking of OMGUS for "FoSsing you twice before you came back from school". Or was that statement supposed to be your evidence? Sorry, evidence is supposed to be based on fact. Since I have a hunch that you are scum, and nothing in your behaviour strikes me as either town, truthful or consistent, I vote
ToonyMan. You use the attention my questions have garnered to hurl lies into the thread and hope they stick.