Alright, I'm pretty sure now.
Townie. If I'm suspected enough to vengekill day 1, I've probably already lost. Plus with only two people bussing is an expensive proposition.
Criptfiend, who here would make the best Godfather?
Criptfiend, who here would make the best Godfather?
Me, because I am the best at everything.
But really. Pander.
Unvote.
Pander.
What do you think about this basically starting at Lyol?
I didn't realize this before, but
Criptfeind skipped right over my supposed scumslip the first time, only to notice it later. So either you didn't read it the first time, or you only realized claiming to be the Godfather was scummy much later on. Considering you
replied to the second part, I'm inclined to think the latter.
Pander.
What do you think about this basically starting at Lyol?
What's Lyol? Do you mean Lysol?
As for a more game-relevant question you don't deserve to have answered (really? Fuck up my name and a very basic term? What's next, Wifum?) starting at Lylo is the whole point, but the guarantee of townies getting a vengekill means it's not a "true" lylo. However, it's best to treat it as such because "50% chance of the townies getting to try again" doesn't sit well with me as the best thing to rely on.
"I agree we should treat this like lylo"?
Really?
I mean I asked you how you felt about the lylo, not if there was one or if you want to rely on a fifty percent chance there is another day.
I said your question was based on a false assumption (that we're presently at LyLo) then gave you a more useful answer than "Mu," which evidently is more than you ought to have gotten.
it's best to treat it as such
So what is it.
Scum.
Okay so telling me that it is not lylo but we should act like it is answers my question about how you feel about that and it is not contradicting with it is not lylo?
No.
It is not.
This is not a rhetorical question, I really want to know how you consolidate two opposites into your argument.
Your question was based on a faulty assumption, which is that it was Lylo.
It is NOT Lylo. We are not guaranteed to lose if we lynch improperly. However, if we lynch improperly we have a VERY HIGH CHANCE of subsequently failing to reach Day 2, and as such should be as CAREFUL as if it were Lylo despite that it is not Lylo.
Not answering my question.
I am just frustrated that do not seem to see the inherent contradiction in your statements.
, almost all of your argument with Pandarsenic has been over two points:
1. He refused to answer your original question
2. He's claiming a contradiction
In the case of #1, he said "starting at lylo is the whole point" and mentioned that he didn't want to rely on a second chance. That's not an especially good answer, but what sort of answer were you expecting? What would have been a good, townlike answer here, and why didn't you bother with any other questions when it became apparent he wasn't going to answer?
In the case of #2, I don't understand how "It's not X, but we should treat it as such" is a contradiction.
Irrelevant, perhaps, but where is he saying two mutually exclusive things?
But what's more, this particular example is
really goddamned obvious. It's not lylo, but we should be careful, because
we might not get a second chance. The first is absolute fact; you can disagree with the second, but that doesn't mean it's irrational, and the premise is likewise absolute fact.
Finger's on the button,
Criptfeind. Anything to say to this?
Author
Topic: Vengeful Mafia 1 - Over - Mafia Wins! (Read 20673 times)