TELL ME WHAT I DID THAT'S SCUMMY AND GIVE ME A PROPER ATTACK
Anger. Rawr.
Okay so telling me that it is not lylo but we should act like it is answers my question about how you feel about that and it is not contradicting with it is not lylo?
This is not a rhetorical question, I really want to know how you consolidate two opposites into your argument.
Your question was based on a faulty assumption, which is that it was Lylo.
It is NOT Lylo. We are not guaranteed to lose if we lynch improperly. However, if we lynch improperly we have a VERY HIGH CHANCE of subsequently failing to reach Day 2, and as such should be as CAREFUL as if it were Lylo despite that it is not Lylo.
Now, listen very carefully.
YOU ARE GOING TO POST WHAT I HAVE DONE THAT IS SCUMMY IN YOUR NEXT POST OR YOU WILL UNVOTE ME AND MAKE A RELEVANT ATTACK ON SOMEONE ELSE. IF YOU DO NOT, EVERY POST I DO FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS DAY WILL BE ME QUOTEPYRAMIDING MY ORIGINAL VOTE ON YOU. Are we clear?PPE: Yes, there is. He's being a useless twat and going "LOOK AT ME I'M SCUMHUNTING" but he ISN'T and it's PISSING ME OFF. Thus the above ultimatum. He can scumhunt for me or he can scumhunt for someone else, but he cannot be a useless cocksucker for the whole day. If I have to I will request that I be lynched and vote myself just so I can fire the goddamn Vengekill at him because he's making Org look more townlike than himself because Org at least isn't pretending he's being relevant to the current discussion unlike Criptfuckface