Yeah and nothing else in DF is nasty or offensive.
Ya got me there. Still, I'd file rape under the same category as feces/urine: would the game really be in any way improved by including it? Realism alone is never a good enough reason.
Homosexuality would add a bit of character to your dwarves at least. Adding rape would do what? Goblins are evil enough, and it would be out of character for dwarves (at least until they stop being abstinent before marriage and 100% faithful to their spouse).
If a viable gameplay reason to include rape arose, I wouldn't be against it. Nor would I be against it for characterization of dwarves/historical figures, but again dwarves would need some behavioral changes before it'd make sense.
Rape is a mechanism of positive sexual selection.
Like "strongest being(A) have killed weaker being(B) and is spreding its semen in B,s female(C) and babys of C will inherit stronger genes of A, insted of weaker genes of B".
Its
that primitive.
Yeah, yeah it is horrible and we cannot compare armorsmith and MaceLord in terms of fittestness and usefulness, but it is a fact.
And when two armys collide, the one, with strongest warriors will be a winner.
There are TONS of talks about eqality, but phisically, every two sentient beings are different. Some one`s more fit to live and other one is less.
And when hundreds and thousands of them are collided, statistics jumps in. And the one population with strongest natural phisical abilitys (with other things like skill, equipment and so on equal) will be a winner.
And its winner`s instinct is to spread his genes, so that
whole race will be stronger.