Also you mentioned graphics. How dare you. (the graphics of the 1st halo game was above average compared to the over 1st person shooters in the stores at that time eg.COD 1)
*cough
PChackcough* Anyway, your "More You Know! *rainbow*" for the day: A year is 365 days (Except on leap year!), or a full orbit of the Earth around the Sun. A
decade is ten years. A century is
one hundred years. A millennium is one thousand year. There's more after that, but they tend to be fuzzy in general use (Epoch, Eon, etc.). Halo has not been around for even approaching a century.
Microsoft hasn't been around a century. Electronic computers
smaller than a large room haven't been around a full hundred years yet. Moral of the story: Please don't tell people Halo has been around a century. That's very, very mistaken and makes everyone involved look silly.
Halo's been around for almost a decade. It's still got a year and just shy of two months to go. I'll give that it was pretty big for getting the Xbox off the ground -- that's important. I'd almost say that's a shame, though. Always sucks to see a particular entertainment device get largely stuck on a particular genre. S'kinda' like a TV that only manages to show spaghetti westerns. The westerns aren't bad, but I want my old school Kung-fu flick occasionally, yanno?
Anyway, off-topic, etc, etc. Reach seems pretty solid for your more-or-less-bog-standard next-gen FPS shooter. Solid experience from what I've been observing, if not even remotely enough to get me to even consider buying a Xbox 360.
I'm done