Zai, not noticing that he is now tied for the chopping block thanks to my vote. Apparently he doesn't care enough to reply?
I noticed. I didn't think that bit was worthy of commenting on. Did you really expect me to say "o noez get ur vote off me!!!!! I CANT BE TIED"? If not, what exactly did you expect me to say? I replied to part of your vote-post. (But looking back, I see I failquoted you. You were the 4th quote in that post.)
Have you read the entire thread yet? If so, still think I'm scum?
I have caught up. More or less. I'm not... entirely
unconvinced either, but towards the later pages you're either getting into your towngroove or working out how to be less irritable about people rightly accusing you of being scum. I'm not sure which it is. I don't have any leverage other than that, though, so I'll let you be until you do something else.
Unvote Zai.So who's my next target?
Does anybody ever listen to me when I point out that this is normal for ToonyMan? Vector, you have the advantage of time in the meta-department, but I've played a number of games with ToonyMan, and this is just what he does. I refuse, outright, to believe that you're unaware of that. In fact, that makes me rather suspicious.
No, it isn't "just what he does." Or, at least, this isn't what I remember him doing. The way he is right now comes off as flat-out uninvolved with the game, which I never noticed before. I noticed him being nutty. I noticed the vote-flopping. I noticed a lot of things... but this comes off as a different behavior to me, which is why I am going to continue to vote him on it, no matter how many people try to make me stand down.
I've caught Toony as scum multiple times, when everyone else was saying "No, that's just Toony being Toony." I may have mis-calibrated, but I'm not going to go "Oh, Toony is just being scumtacular as usual. *ignore*"
Toony, here's your reasoning:
He's posting a rapid fire of questions just like the last game.
Yes, that's really... good to see, man. That really clears things up and makes everything nice and explainable.
And...
This game is being really stupid, damn. I'm going to keep my vote on Zai.
I'm aggravated at this game and after scanning through Zai doesn't improve.
Second choices would be Mr.Person and Tack.
Mystery choice would be Josh.
This is why you're still voting. In what world do you think this is acceptable, hm?
You're not bringing up any other points, you're just stalling Vector.
Stalling for what? What other points do I need? I want to lynch you, damn it! All I need to do that is to convince some other people that you're scum--so I'm going to keep shouting my argument into the wind for as long as I have to.
I also went over the Vector/Webadict argument in a little more detail, and I realized something pretty simple: Webadict is right. As usual, I suppose.
How can you excuse just wanting to lynch someone? Okay, yeah, we're town. That's our kill. But you're insisting that you're not
stalling but rather just immune from the need to accumulate sufficient evidence. That's stupid. That's not townie. That's not reasonable,
Vector.In addition, regarding the meta: This is exactly what he looked like in Vote Mafia. And as I screamed at Mr. Person many times that game (sorry about that, Mr. Person), he
rolled up town. This is
normal. This is
what he is right now. Stop making excuses.
Webadict: I look forward to it.
Elegy, Tack, Mr. Person: Oi. Elegy, if you think Tack's scum, vote him and draw up evidence. Tack, if you're done trolling, try actually scumhunting. Mr. Person... carry on. You're fine.