Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Pandarsenic]

WAI U IGNORIN MAH QUESTION ELEGY

[Pandarsenic]

And that's absolutely buddying/chainsawdefending

[Zai]

And that's absolutely buddying/chainsawdefending

This is what I was getting at, Joker.

[ToonyMan]

I have all the evidence, this game is over.

I win.

[Elegy]

Pandarsenic: It's because I am a god damn psychic. But you can vote for him now if you want :]

[Tack]

Well, if I were godfather, I would've picked probably Vector, Toonyman or Webaddict, as an experienced player, and an unknown who isn't Ulogy.

I also voted Toonyman on a hunch- this hunch being that he sent roles to only the mafia, and forgot to send them to Townies.

[Pandarsenic]

Hmmm.

Elegy, why did you vote ToonyMan for staying on Zai?

[Jokerman-EXE]

Oh. Just seemed to me that it was a random vote/playing along with the light-hearted feel of the game thus far.

In retrospect, Zai and Pandar have no hearts, so I guess it can't have been that. Unvote Zai, I fuckin' hate RVs anyway.

[Zai]

Oh. Just seemed to me that it was a random vote/playing along with the light-hearted feel of the game thus far.

It was the timing that made it look like he was chainsawing TM "for" me. He did it within 5 minutes of TM voting me.

Though I guess it does look like a pun now. But it was unnecessary for Dirge to unvote and then vote TM if he was just bringing up a pun.

And you're right. I have no heart. I am a soulless creature.

[Mr.Person]

Hey Lonewolf, who would you have chosen to be mafia with you if you were the godfather?

[webadict]

Question: Wouldn't've made more sense to have everyone pick their scumteam before rolling the Godfather? I mean, we can pretty much figure who is or isn't the Godfather by seeing the activity at the start of the game.

Probably Pandarsenic.

[Pandarsenic]

Unvote

Elegy, don't forget to answer my question when you get back. For now though, something is bothering me.

Tack, didn't it seem a bit premature to you to start randomvoting? Surely nobody else would've had a PM yet then. It seemed odd that you'd jump like that but what wuba just said made this possibility click... though as you'll notice:

Tack, why so jump-

Elegy, why vote the person I was going to vote? D:<

I had realized something was off about Tack before but figured I would vote someone who hadn't been voted for RVS (then fucked that up because I didn't see a post).

[Tack]

While we're not talking about the Psychology of the GM, and It may be cruel to abuse this in order to win, but if Toonyman is mafia, he'll be out of the game in the first round, which is always helpful.

My simple reasoning is- when a GM gets the PM back saying who else the godfather wants in the team, he sends out the PM's and such of who is who. Now, Toonyman Commented on his role four minutes before I commented on mine. Toony therefore recieved his before then, and I recieved mine afterwards. And when I recieved my PM, it was short and sweet. No flavor. Therefore, it could be assumed ToonyMan was the first to get the PM, and I the last. However, this works against him in two ways. If I were the GM, And I have been GM's in other games, but not mafia, I honestly have to say I'd send out PM's to Mafia first. Mafia are the most interesting part of the game, and you'd still have the names of the pick-ee's fresh in your mind, so they'd be the ones you'd type in the bar- You don't have to check on them. Therefore if Toonyman was one of the first to get a PM, he'd be mafia. In the time it would take to send thirteen PM's, in a row, with such a small amount of typing, I'd give it, say... Three minutes.
Therefore I could only assume there was a pause. Perhaps GM-san only sent PM's to Mafia, and then, when ToonyMan and I called him out, he immediately sent PM's to other players. It's just a suspicion, but it's better than what I have on other players this early in the game, so it's what I'm voting.

tl;dr: Still voting ToonyMan. It's shameless to vote for someone, due to the GM's activities, but I'm not going to Not vote for him, simply because of a technical error. It'd waste us game time.

[webadict]

While we're not talking about the Psychology of the GM, and It may be cruel to abuse this in order to win, but if Toonyman is mafia, he'll be out of the game in the first round, which is always helpful.

My simple reasoning is- when a GM gets the PM back saying who else the godfather wants in the team, he sends out the PM's and such of who is who. Now, Toonyman Commented on his role four minutes before I commented on mine. Toony therefore recieved his before then, and I recieved mine afterwards. And when I recieved my PM, it was short and sweet. No flavor. Therefore, it could be assumed ToonyMan was the first to get the PM, and I the last. However, this works against him in two ways. If I were the GM, And I have been GM's in other games, but not mafia, I honestly have to say I'd send out PM's to Mafia first. Mafia are the most interesting part of the game, and you'd still have the names of the pick-ee's fresh in your mind, so they'd be the ones you'd type in the bar- You don't have to check on them. Therefore if Toonyman was one of the first to get a PM, he'd be mafia. In the time it would take to send thirteen PM's, in a row, with such a small amount of typing, I'd give it, say... Three minutes.
Therefore I could only assume there was a pause. Perhaps GM-san only sent PM's to Mafia, and then, when ToonyMan and I called him out, he immediately sent PM's to other players. It's just a suspicion, but it's better than what I have on other players this early in the game, so it's what I'm voting.

tl;dr: Still voting ToonyMan. It's shameless to vote for someone, due to the GM's activities, but I'm not going to Not vote for him, simply because of a technical error. It'd waste us game time.

This is why I would have asked for everyone's picks, locked the game, rolled the Godfather, sent out the PMs, then started the game. It eliminates the needless talking WIFOM and creates a certain air.

So, good point. ToonyMan

[JoshuaFH]

If that is the actual case, then I call for a DO OVER, because the game should be unbiased and impartial in every way, and I simply can't tolerate such heinous mistakes.

It wouldn't be that problematic, I don't think, since we're still at the start of day 1.