ok, taking this a quote at a time. talked about the first question i asked (fish-gate, or whatever) a couple of posts ago.
the least i can say for you, toaster, is that i'm glad that there's someone out there that's getting down to the business of scumhunting. that's what i'll put this little bit of aggression down to... for the time being.
Buddying too? REALLY? Also, an empty threat.
way to pick up on the scathing/secptical/sarcy tone there. also, how can you call it an empty threat? how can you possibly make that supposition?
even if this comes very soon after the first vote for me
Who gives a shit? If you're scummy, you're scummy. Don't try and impose some bullshit vote limitation, as it won't work.
well,
i give a shit. obviously. oh wait, of course, you need to do that thing when you completely don't tell anyone about your suspicions or about what you see in people that is scummy, mmyeah, totally my bad.
Who are you most wary of and why?
winners of the last game, given their heightened powers.
Who do you want to hear from most?
at the moment, the people who haven't posted yet; hence why i poked you. guess you're off of that list, then.
Do you have any suspicions yet?
not very strong suspicions, but i'm keeping an eye on org. and you, for that matter, you question-dodging scum!
so if you won't answer my original question, would you care to answer those questions you just quoted at me?
You then proceed to explain that you fear powerful individuals, you suspect the guy you just said was acting normal, say Archangel is dodging your question for a third time, and drop your question for a copy of the ones he just asked you.
Yeeeaaaah.
1) got a problem with fearing powered individuals? 2) by this point org had made some suspect posts; besides, i said acting normal
for org, which is inherently suspicious anyway 3) so you
don't have a problem with question-dodging scum? and 4) already said why i changed my question - because, for whatever reason, he was keeping his mouth shut (before i would've said that this was pretty condemning, but now that i realise the suspect nature of the question, i can see his point... if he had one) and it's better to be able to have some sort of read on a guy rather than nothing at all at this stage at the game.
and no, it was basically just a less run-of-the-mill voteprod. hopefully, something a bit different might catch the scum out.
And how exactly is this question a simple voteprod? What answer are they supposed to give that is both not scummy and not feeding scum information?
like i said, being new to this i wasn't struck by how the question would help scum. and i can't predict what sort of answer a person would give to that question (again, that's the noob in me), so i would judge whether it was scummy or not based on what the actual answer was. which is stating the obvious, but that was the plan, didn't (couldn't) go in there with a predetermined idea of good answer/bad answer, as the concepts of goodness/badness would present themselves upon the question being answered. basically, i jumped in at the deep end; i can see now that it wasn't the best question to do so with.
i stopped asking him the original question because it was becoming plain that i wasn't going to get an answer.
If it's a reasonable question, why is it not scummy to refuse to answer? If it's the sort of question that's perfectly reasonable for town to refuse to answer, why did you ask it?
at the time, i definately implied that it WAS scummy to question dodge. but yeah, i know the nature of the question now, so can understand why he didn't answer. and like i said, didn't occur to me that it wasn't a reasonable question for town to answer. /brokenrecordplayer
and i ain't done with him yet. my vote is still on him, and my questions still stand.
So you still want him to explain his role.
way to take this out of context. i was referring to the set of three questions, not the original, at this point; three questions which had (have) nothing to do with his role.
the least i can say for you, toaster, is that i'm glad that there's someone out there that's getting down to the business of scumhunting. that's what i'll put this little bit of aggression down to... for the time being. even if this comes very soon after the first vote for me (won't you be following up on that vote with some questioning, breadbocks?)
How magnanimous of you to forgive Toaster's unusual aggression as probably scum hunting, for the moment. Particularly gracious given he's the second vote on you, which is terribly suspicious.
ATTN: ALL SCUMHUNTING MUST BE DONE IN THE VOICE OF A TOTAL DOUCHEWAD IN ORDER FOR IT TO EVER WORK AT ALL YUP NO OTHER POSSIBLE WAY TO DO IT MUST BE DONE IN A PREDEFINED VOICE.
honestly, this just
really pisses me off. it's not even a valid point! what the fuck, man. seriously :|
You want to know when his role is most useful. Knowing that, you can decide how soon you need to night kill him.
oh, i thought rolefishing meant trying to suggest to the mod what sort of powers you want when you pick your role. and no, it was basically just a less run-of-the-mill voteprod. hopefully, something a bit different might catch the scum out.
Not buying it.
whyever not?
the least i can say for you, toaster, is that i'm glad that there's someone out there that's getting down to the business of scumhunting. that's what i'll put this little bit of aggression down to... for the time being. even if this comes very soon after the first vote for me (won't you be following up on that vote with some questioning, breadbocks?)
Again, look at your tone of voice? It went from "ANSWER ME DAMMIT" (good) to "Please answer, if it's not too much trouble?" (scummy). Then you buddy me and try to get me to back off. No.
see previous points. tone was supposed to be sarcy/scathing/whatnot. so it's the opposite of buddying, actually.
@Scatterbrain: What, exactly, were you hoping to get from asking when Archangel's role powers would be most useful? Like, what would of been a scummy response and what would of been a townlike response?
covered this back a bit too.
Whoops, that was meant to go at the end of this:
Who are you most wary of and why?
winners of the last game, given their heightened powers.
Who do you want to hear from most?
at the moment, the people who haven't posted yet; hence why i poked you. guess you're off of that list, then.
Do you have any suspicions yet?
not very strong suspicions, but i'm keeping an eye on org. and you, for that matter, you question-dodging scum!
so if you won't answer my original question, would you care to answer those questions you just quoted at me?
That was a question? I thought it was just some random silliness you came up with to put with your vote.
/facepalm
haha, yes, it was a question; though it didn't have a question mark after it. misunderstanding, i guess.
(alternatively, if being a douchebag is the only possible way to play this game, then at this point i lay into him for being an idiot, even though i can reasonably see that i was at fault. derp.)
You asked your question is a silly manner, which lead me to believe that it wasn't serious. And you aren't going after me particularly enthusiastically.
Hmm... I'm a little suspicious of you now.
can accept first bit; but i asked you it like three times, besides taking the trouble to change to a question that would actually get something out of you, so if you're implying that i'm not being enthusiastic about it enough i'd say you're... well, wrong. if anything, you're the one that needs to be pushing more; don't suppose you plan on following up on dem dar suspicions?
---
hopefully i got everything, had loads of tabs open with different quotes in them, so i had bits of responses all over the place, sorry if i missed any. gonna try and make a more pro-active post next, need to marshal my thoughts a bit. also, need more support for an extension yo.
Author
Topic: BYOR 5 - Night 3: Under Con-Troll. (Read 72278 times)