Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Current ideas on evolution?

The Old-Evolution-Mind control fungus!
Counter-Evolution-No mind control fungus!

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 138

Author Topic: Evolution: Jethro is back!?!?! [SPACE]  (Read 124430 times)

neo1096

  • Bay Watcher
  • It watches and waits...
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2010, 05:15:00 pm »

Logged
What again? Iron scepter - Lovehealing? Oh, I almost shed a tear... Put it in your ass, I'm talking about importans artistic defences!!! You see, yaks and bridge... Stop polishing that scepter! You're disgusting me!"

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2010, 05:18:12 pm »

The cell doesn't even realize that you are eating it. Stupid cell. You get two more pieces of RNA, absorb 6 amino acids, 4 glucose and enough energy to fully absorb the cell. Meaning you have the same about of energy as you had before. (But much more materials)

Name of Species: None
Name of Cell: None
RNA: 6, Amino Acids: 11, Energy: 2, Glucose: 4
Simple Membrane, Simple Cytoplasm, Simple Centrosome, Simple Nucleus, Simple Chemical Detection Organelle, Simple Sensory Cilia.

Naming cell:

Xeno (3)
Tiny Lizard (1)

Naming Species:

Tiny Lizard People (1)
Xenos Infiltratus (2)
Xenomorph (1)
Logged

Evergod41

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #33 on: September 08, 2010, 05:21:03 pm »

Develop oxygen resistance, while burning Glucose.

neo1096

  • Bay Watcher
  • It watches and waits...
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #34 on: September 08, 2010, 05:25:04 pm »

Develop oxygen resistance, while burning Glucose.
If the cell were to develop vacuoles and a lysosome could we then retrofit a cilia to inject the cell destroying enzymes into other cells? Of course we would need a golgi apparatus to create a lysosome.
Logged
What again? Iron scepter - Lovehealing? Oh, I almost shed a tear... Put it in your ass, I'm talking about importans artistic defences!!! You see, yaks and bridge... Stop polishing that scepter! You're disgusting me!"

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2010, 05:28:39 pm »

Develop oxygen resistance, while burning Glucose.
If the cell were to develop vacuoles and a lysosome could we then retrofit a cilia to inject the cell destroying enzymes into other cells? Of course we would need a golgi apparatus to create a lysosome.

I would have no objection to that. (But you need DNA to use it.)
Logged

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2010, 05:34:30 pm »

I'll be offline now, so argue among yourselves what to do next.
Logged

Nirur Torir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2010, 05:38:30 pm »

We must swim around collecting more glucose.

Let's go for chloroplasts in the near future. Free food is good.

Name cell Xeno.
Name species Xenomorph.
Logged

breadbocks

  • Bay Watcher
  • A manacled Mentlegen. (ಠ_ృ)
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2010, 06:03:44 pm »

Agreed. Collect enough stuff to begin production of i)Mitocondria ii)Choroplasts iii)Endoplasmic Reticulums of both kinds.
Logged
Clearly, cakes are the next form of human evolution.

Iituem

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2010, 06:10:43 pm »

Hi, I'm a microbiologist.  Just thought I'd add a couple of shiny cents to some of these suggestions.

Mitochondria and Cytoplasts are of extra-cellular origin.  There are essentially independent cells within Eukaryotic (nucleus-containing) cells.  It's quite possible the nucleus was originally of extracellular origin too, but that doesn't matter as they are encoded within cellular DNA.  Mitochondria and Cytoplasts are not - to get them for the very first time you'll need to absorb proto-microchondria and proto-cytoplasts from the environment.
Logged
Let's Play Arcanum: Of Steamworks & Magic Obscura! - The adventures of Jack Hunt, gentleman rogue.

No slaughtering every man, woman and child we see just to teleport to the moon.

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #40 on: September 08, 2010, 06:15:00 pm »

You think how amazing it would be to have better oxygen resistance, but have no idea how to get it.

Instead, you swim around, looking for more glucose. You need to ferment a glucose inorder to do this, but you find 5 more glucose!

You continue searching, finding four more amino acids, and enough glucose to power the trip.

As you slow down, you bump into a tasty bit of sugar worth 3 glucose. Nice.

You feel that you have enough materials to do something.

Name of Species: None
Name of Cell: None
RNA: 6, Amino Acids: 15, Energy: 2, Glucose: 11
Simple Membrane, Simple Cytoplasm, Simple Centrosome, Simple Nucleus, Simple Chemical Detection Organelle, Simple Sensory Cilia.

Naming cell:

Xeno (5)
Tiny Lizard (1)

Naming Species:

Tiny Lizard People (1)
Xenos Infiltratus (3)
Xenomorph (2)
« Last Edit: September 08, 2010, 06:21:14 pm by USEC_OFFICER »
Logged

breadbocks

  • Bay Watcher
  • A manacled Mentlegen. (ಠ_ృ)
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #41 on: September 08, 2010, 06:19:20 pm »

Damn you scientists! Anyways, I vote Xeno and Xenos Infiltratus. Also can we get E. Reticulums?
Logged
Clearly, cakes are the next form of human evolution.

neo1096

  • Bay Watcher
  • It watches and waits...
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #42 on: September 08, 2010, 06:20:49 pm »

Develop oxygen resistance and hunt for a proto-mitochondria. THen we shal develop a golgi apparatus. Mu hahahahahahaha *choke*
Logged
What again? Iron scepter - Lovehealing? Oh, I almost shed a tear... Put it in your ass, I'm talking about importans artistic defences!!! You see, yaks and bridge... Stop polishing that scepter! You're disgusting me!"

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #43 on: September 08, 2010, 06:21:43 pm »

You are too stupid to develop those things. Some DNA might be in order.
Logged

Evergod41

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution: What Spore should have been. [CELL-FORM]
« Reply #44 on: September 08, 2010, 06:23:15 pm »

Hi, I'm a microbiologist.  Just thought I'd add a couple of shiny cents to some of these suggestions.

Mitochondria and Cytoplasts are of extra-cellular origin.  There are essentially independent cells within Eukaryotic (nucleus-containing) cells.  It's quite possible the nucleus was originally of extracellular origin too, but that doesn't matter as they are encoded within cellular DNA.  Mitochondria and Cytoplasts are not - to get them for the very first time you'll need to absorb proto-microchondria and proto-cytoplasts from the environment.
DAMN YOU AND YOUR SCIENCE!!!!! going and ruining all of the fun.....

Develop oxygen resistance and hunt for a proto-mitochondria. THen we shal develop a golgi apparatus. Mu hahahahahahaha *choke*
Aye, except for evil laughter, choking, and O2 resistance...
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 138