Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Siquo]

PROPOSAL: No Rules Shall Be Retroactive.

DISAGREE: complicated is fun.

[Africa]

PROPOSAL: No Rules Shall Be Retroactive.

DISAGREE

Also, it does indeed appear that the current wording means disagreeing doesn't matter; it's just the two proposals with the most "support" votes win, so abstaining is just as good as disagreeing.

PROPOSAL: all vote posts must quote the proposal being voted on.

SUPPORT

PROPOSAL: No Rules Shall Be Retroactive.

Strongly DISAGREE. It will be much more interesting if there can be retroactive changes...

[Sheb]

And what about time paradox then? Like if a rules retroactively change the vote so that it cannot be applied?

[Siquo]

Paradoxes are fun, and don't need retroactivity. Normal rule additions can create paradoxes as well.

I PROPOSE: Anyone who, on purpose or by accident, creates a paradox by having his/her proposal accepted, whether it is retroactive or not, automatically loses and the offending rule is rendered null and void.

Fun stuff: if someone proposes a paradox we can make him lose by all voting for it.

[Blackdutchie]

I PROPOSE: Anyone who, on purpose or by accident, creates a paradox by having his/her proposal accepted, whether it is retroactive or not, automatically loses and the offending rule is rendered null and void.

Fun stuff: if someone proposes a paradox we can make him lose by all voting for it.

*SUPPORT*

[qwertyuiopas]

PROPOSAL: No Rules Shall Be Retroactive.

*SUPPORT*

[Sheb]

Paradoxes are fun, and don't need retroactivity. Normal rule additions can create paradoxes as well.

I PROPOSE: Anyone who, on purpose or by accident, creates a paradox by having his/her proposal accepted, whether it is retroactive or not, automatically loses and the offending rule is rendered null and void.

Fun stuff: if someone proposes a paradox we can make him lose by all voting for it.

*AGREE*

[Africa]

Paradoxes are fun, and don't need retroactivity. Normal rule additions can create paradoxes as well.

I PROPOSE: Anyone who, on purpose or by accident, creates a paradox by having his/her proposal accepted, whether it is retroactive or not, automatically loses and the offending rule is rendered null and void.

Fun stuff: if someone proposes a paradox we can make him lose by all voting for it.

DISAGREE

PROPOSAL: If the adopting of a proposal creates a paradox, all players receive three (5) elephants.

[qwertyuiopas]

Paradoxes are fun, and don't need retroactivity. Normal rule additions can create paradoxes as well.

I PROPOSE: Anyone who, on purpose or by accident, creates a paradox by having his/her proposal accepted, whether it is retroactive or not, automatically loses and the offending rule is rendered null and void.

Fun stuff: if someone proposes a paradox we can make him lose by all voting for it.

*SUPPORT*

PROPOSAL: If the adopting of a proposal creates a paradox, all players receive three (5) elephants.

*SUPPORT*

[Blackdutchie]

Proposal: If a person receives four or more elephants, rules they proposed shall be removed from the rule list at a rate of 1 rule for 4 elephants, and 1 rule for each additional elephant.

[Africa]

Proposal: If a person receives four or more elephants, rules they proposed shall be removed from the rule list at a rate of 1 rule for 4 elephants, and 1 rule for each additional elephant.

SUPPORT like whoa

[Armok]

I also DISSAGREE with all the proposals posted since my last post.

[breadbocks]

I SUPPORT any posts involving paradoxen since my last post, I DISAGREE with the rest since my last post.

[fivex]

I SUPPORT all above proposals

[Siquo]

I retroactively and proactively SUPPORT any proposal that Armok disagrees with and I have not yet voted for.