Tsk, tsk, Vector. Disappointing answer, really. I just expected so much better from you, even after answering the question for you.
I mean, come on. Is that your best? ... Is it? Because it's lacking something. Like, you know, substance. It was just an answer to you! It wasn't read. It wasn't analyzed. It was just you sputtering robotic automatic replies like an answering machine to a family on vacation.
Puh.
... I frankly have no idea what you're talking about. All answers are answers. Some answers only require a basic cross-checking with a known body of information.
Is an exemplary answer one where I make up statistics to "prove" my point? Or should I not stick to what I know?
No, an exemplary answer is saying screw the question and firing back. You didn't test to see the point of the question, questioner, or even why you should answer. You just answered it, bringing minimal effort and scumhunting into the entire game.
Heck, I've got a new thing we should try. It's called nothing. Let's all do nothing. Oh, want to ask a question? It has to have explicitly no purpose or relevance to the game in question. Been asked a stupid question already? Why, it's your turn down at Unintelligence to chain letter your own brand of ignorance.
That's what I mean. I mean, there's lots of things you can do, but firing these stupid questions never works. Like, ever. If you manage to lynch scum, it's not because you asked them how many dimples are on a golf ball. It's out of dumb luck. No, like
DUMB luck. Because the scum would have to be a complete moron to be lynched.
Now, maybe you understand what I'm talking about and would love to participate in this new age style called rational reasoning, so that we can have a true psychological and philosophical game.
So, start nit-picking lines, because there's plenty for seconds and thirds.
Mr.Person, what do you think the lurking is going to be like in this game? Any solutions?
Eduren, is webadict being aggressive town or defensive scum?
Eduren beat me to it. Why is it one or the other? That's a fallacy. You're forcing a dilemma on someone by giving them two options, as opposed to a range of valid options. Also, you're refusing to ask me the question, making an indirect attack at me, and you'd be using someone else to determine whether a bandwagon would suffice. Those are all scummy. See, this is a direct attack, scumwad.