Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people  (Read 2655 times)

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2010, 01:39:48 am »

In!
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

iceball3

  • Bay Watcher
  • Miaou~
    • View Profile
    • My DA
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2010, 01:44:10 am »

IN
Logged

Ottofar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wait, spinning?
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2010, 08:41:09 am »

Yeah this game seems a little bland to me, maybe there is someway to spice it up a little?

Like maybe make so there is two teams that are against each other, yeah. Like you are on a team and you win if anyone in your team wins, although that may be boring as well... hum... Perhaps you can make it so that one of the groups knows who is in each group and can talk to each other but are smaller. So basically the big group is trying to find the small group. Although that may make it hard for the small group... I know! You can give the small group the power to make one person lose after the main voting section is over! To keep it fair of course you would have to make it so that anyone who loses do not get any votes though.
This.

ExKirby

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Jump On The Daily Comic Bandwagon.
    • View Profile
    • ExKirby's Generic Randomness
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2010, 09:36:35 am »

That would turn it into a game of Mafia, not some fun minigame.
Logged
Derm would be a Half-Minute Hero boss. YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO FUCK HIM UP OR HE DOES IT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD!

GlyphGryph

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #19 on: August 16, 2010, 10:21:34 am »

Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
Logged

Cheeetar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Spaceghost Perpetrator
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2010, 05:10:31 am »

That would turn it into a game of Mafia, not some fun minigame.

That's the joke.
Logged
I've played some mafia.

Most of the time when someone is described as politically correct they are simply correct.

ExKirby

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Jump On The Daily Comic Bandwagon.
    • View Profile
    • ExKirby's Generic Randomness
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2010, 07:27:56 am »

I don't get it.
Logged
Derm would be a Half-Minute Hero boss. YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO FUCK HIM UP OR HE DOES IT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD!

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #22 on: August 17, 2010, 07:30:28 am »

Joining this game.
Logged

Ottofar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wait, spinning?
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2010, 07:50:57 am »

RedWarrior0

  • Bay Watcher
  • she/her
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2010, 01:31:08 pm »

Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
Logged

ExKirby

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Jump On The Daily Comic Bandwagon.
    • View Profile
    • ExKirby's Generic Randomness
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2010, 02:13:00 pm »

Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
Logged
Derm would be a Half-Minute Hero boss. YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO FUCK HIM UP OR HE DOES IT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD!

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2010, 12:20:54 am »

Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
I DONT FEEL CONVINCED
Logged

breadbocks

  • Bay Watcher
  • A manacled Mentlegen. (ಠ_ృ)
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2010, 12:28:07 am »

Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
I DONT FEEL CONVINCED
STOP! Hammeh time! ===============[]

Hmmm. This post doesn't have anything for the impression that I would like to play.

Logged
Clearly, cakes are the next form of human evolution.
Pages: 1 [2]