Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people  (Read 2660 times)

ExKirby

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Jump On The Daily Comic Bandwagon.
    • View Profile
    • ExKirby's Generic Randomness
Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« on: August 12, 2010, 02:27:29 pm »
In this game, you want to have as FEW VOTES AS POSSIBLE. Every "day", there will be a vote, and the person who gets the most votes loses. Days will last 3 days and you can still vote after you've lost. In the event of a tie, all players that are tied lose. We keep going until we have one winner or everyone has lost.

Players:

Armok
Cheeetar
Vertigon
Imakuni
GlyphGryph
Hugehead
Toaster
Criptfeind
Lucus Casius
Pandarsenic
Barbarossa the Seal God
iceball3
ToonyMan
breadbocks
« Last Edit: August 18, 2010, 03:17:08 am by ExKirby »
Logged
Quote from: Darvi on October 31, 2012, 11:58:22 am
Derm would be a Half-Minute Hero boss. YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO FUCK HIM UP OR HE DOES IT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD!

Armok

  • Bay Watcher
  • God of Blood
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2010, 04:11:08 pm »
in
Logged
So says Armok, God of blood.
Sszsszssoo...
Sszsszssaaayysss...
III...

Cheeetar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Spaceghost Perpetrator
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2010, 05:16:08 pm »
In
Logged
I've played some mafia.

Quote from: mainiac on October 14, 2016, 11:55:54 am
Most of the time when someone is described as politically correct they are simply correct.

Vertigon

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2010, 07:17:02 pm »
Aw hell, I jumped ship in SCWW, I might as well.
Logged

Imakuni

  • Bay Watcher
  • !!Dance Floor!!
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2010, 07:26:45 pm »
In.
Logged
Quote from: ledgekindred on August 18, 2011, 09:40:18 pm
Urist McImmigrant: "What?! Hey! What's going onnn---aaaaRRRGGHH!!"
Urist McSurgeon: "Must remove the rot, yes.  This one is unclean, ssssss.  Purity of essence, yesss."
Urist McImmigrant: "Whhaa---aaaARRGHH OW!  MY PANCREAS!  AAAAGGHH!! THAT'S MY - NOOOOO---AAARRGHGHHH!!!"
Urist McImmigrant has suffocated.

GlyphGryph

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2010, 10:00:40 pm »
I'm definitely not involving myself in this kind of game. Definitely.
Logged

Hugehead

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2010, 11:57:46 pm »
Why would I want to be in.
Logged
Quote from: beorn080 on July 14, 2010, 01:41:08 pm
We're Bay12er's. If there is a bug, we will find it, exploit it, and make a recursive statue out of it. Just look up Planepacked.
Quote from: Hivemind on February 01, 2011, 10:43:39 pm
When a dwarf enters a martial trance, they become Jedi. Short, drunken Jedi.

Toaster

  • Bay Watcher
  • Appliance
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2010, 02:29:32 pm »
We are the knights who say... IN!
Logged
Quote from: syvarris on December 27, 2015, 08:03:03 pm
HMR stands for Hazardous Materials Requisition, not Horrible Massive Ruination, though I can understand how one could get confused.
Quote from: Hapah on November 04, 2015, 11:43:09 am
God help us if we have to agree on pizza toppings at some point. There will be no survivors.

ExKirby

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Jump On The Daily Comic Bandwagon.
    • View Profile
    • ExKirby's Generic Randomness
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2010, 04:25:53 pm »
7 down, 12 to go.
Logged
Quote from: Darvi on October 31, 2012, 11:58:22 am
Derm would be a Half-Minute Hero boss. YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO FUCK HIM UP OR HE DOES IT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD!

Criptfeind

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2010, 04:27:15 pm »
Wait, you really think you can find 19 people to play this type of game?
Logged

Hugehead

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2010, 07:39:01 pm »
Quote from: Criptfeind on August 13, 2010, 04:27:15 pm
Wait, you really think you can find 19 people to play this type of game?
Fixed for you.
Logged
Quote from: beorn080 on July 14, 2010, 01:41:08 pm
We're Bay12er's. If there is a bug, we will find it, exploit it, and make a recursive statue out of it. Just look up Planepacked.
Quote from: Hivemind on February 01, 2011, 10:43:39 pm
When a dwarf enters a martial trance, they become Jedi. Short, drunken Jedi.

Lucus Casius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2010, 08:31:29 pm »
in
Logged

GlyphGryph

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #12 on: August 16, 2010, 01:24:20 am »
Why is this on the third page!?

We need more losers!

Also, you should flesh out in the OP that those who have lost can still vote.

I just realized - isn't this sort of how survivor works? Vote one person to lose each week... and in the end, don't the losers end up picking the winner? Crazy!
« Last Edit: August 16, 2010, 01:26:36 am by GlyphGryph »
Logged

Pandarsenic

  • Bay Watcher
  • FABULOUS Gunslinger
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2010, 01:34:25 am »
In
Logged
KARATE CHOP TO THE SOUL
Quote from: Neruz on November 10, 2009, 01:04:23 am
Your bone is the best Pandar honey. The best.
Quote from: ToonyMan on April 12, 2010, 05:35:44 pm
YOUR BONE IS THE BEST PANDAR
[Cheeetar] Pandar doesn't have issues, he has style.
Quote from: Vector on April 25, 2011, 06:48:45 pm
Fuck off, you fucking fucker-fuck :I

Criptfeind

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2010, 01:35:25 am »
Yeah this game seems a little bland to me, maybe there is someway to spice it up a little?

Like maybe make so there is two teams that are against each other, yeah. Like you are on a team and you win if anyone in your team wins, although that may be boring as well... hum... Perhaps you can make it so that one of the groups knows who is in each group and can talk to each other but are smaller. So basically the big group is trying to find the small group. Although that may make it hard for the small group... I know! You can give the small group the power to make one person lose after the main voting section is over! To keep it fair of course you would have to make it so that anyone who loses do not get any votes though.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »