It's a good idea to make Fishbreath
the Prompt Guy, as I seem to be crap at coming up with good ones.
So, the person who not so long ago (by sociological standards) advocated his fancy word tags, wants to get rid of them entirely?
The world is changing, indeed. Well, I feel like I haven't written anything creative for ages, so I'll probably try taking this prompt on.
And now, as we're a few lines into this post, I'd like to ask the opinion of all reading this on the matter that drove me to feel alien to this forum and almost abandon (but not entirely, thanks to Fishbreath) this thread. Do you think that the writer is a servant of readers, that he/she should leave his/her personality behind when getting into a story, and actually what he/she thinks of his/her story is irrelevant as its quality is for readers to decide?
And. I hope somebody agrees with me that critique isn't, at least always, to expose the flaws of a piece, that it may be educational for the writer. Just on that point that you should do to others as you want others to do to you. People learn their whole lives, and writers are among the hardest learners. And if you aren't a writer, and you're learning some new skill, you don't really want people to laugh at you, and much rather want them tell you how you could improve.
Edit: Oh. A community story, as I see it, needs a strong writer to lead it. If someone would like to lead such a project, then speak up.
Although, a community story could be combined with prompts, and then we would only need our dear Fishbreath to provide prompts, and then together wrangle the story through next impossible plot twist brought about by the prompt.