Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ToonyMan]

Stop being a stubborn dumbass and grit those teeth.

[Criptfeind]

Why must you insult me? How is that productive?

[ToonyMan]

Why must you insult me? How is that productive?

Dude, Pandarsenic answered you twice and you just don't get it.

[Criptfeind]

He said "You volunteered to lose, so I don't vote you." I asked why and he responded. "He volunteered to lose, so I don't vote him." So I said why and he responded. "He volunteered to lose, so I don't vote him."

That is not answering.

[Pandarsenic]

Because... voting him would not be helping him lose, which is what he chose to do?

I genuinely don't get what's unclear here. I'm not trying to be insulting.

[Criptfeind]

Ah okay then.

I believe that the basic disconnect is that you think he wants to lose. I do not think that is the case, I believe he wants to win but wants to help others more. I do not think he would have a issue with you voting for him.

...

On the other hand I am not him so I truly do not know.

[Armok]

It's not a cabal. It's a group tied together by mutual return of favors.

It's like your cabal is an artificial top down communist byrocracy, and this one is an anacho-capitalistic decentralized grouping that arose naturally.

[Lonewolf I]

Ah okay then.

I believe that the basic disconnect is that you think he wants to lose. I do not think that is the case, I believe he wants to win but wants to help others more. I do not think he would have a issue with you voting for him.

...

On the other hand I am not him so I truly do not know.

Pegged it.  Also, garnering his vote would be just another step in my eventual plan for Bay12 Forum Domination.

It's not a cabal. It's a group tied together by mutual return of favors.

It's like your cabal is an artificial top down communist byrocracy, and this one is an anacho-capitalistic decentralized grouping that arose naturally.

Go on...

[Cheeetar]

Vote Count:
Armok (3): Pandarsenic, Tylui, ToonyMan
Solifuge (3): Lucus Casius, Criptfiend, Diablous
SHAD0Wdump (1): Armok


Tie game. Day extended.
:|

[Toaster]

Solifuge dammit.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

(and if this wins vote Soli)

[Cheeetar]

Solifuge wins.

Day 6 begins.

[Tylui]

Armok!

Criptfiend: Please take note that I have voted for Armok BEFORE Pandarsenic voted for him. Three turns in a row now. Also please take note that I am not following ANYBODY's suggestions of voting except for my own.

And for the method of me voting I'm doing it by seniority(Register date). With the exception being that I voted for Pandarsenic before Armok because he was about to win anyway. And he was next in line.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Tylui         January 09, 2007
Armok         February 12, 2007
Pandarsenic       December 04, 2007
Toaster         January 19, 2008
ToonyMan      February 27, 2008
SHAD0Wdump       March 05, 2008
Cheeetar      August 29, 2008
webadict      September 19, 2008
zchris13      February 08, 2009
Solifuge      February 28, 2009
RedWarrior0      March 22, 2009
Criptfeind      June 06, 2009
Spartan 117      June 21, 2009
Cheddarius      December 08, 2009
Diablous      January 05, 2010
Vertigon      March 18, 2010
Lonewolf I      May 04, 2010
Hugehead      June 16, 2010
Lucus Casius      July 20, 2010

[Diablous]

He volunteered to lose. I can only assume he's attempting to be competitive in the picture posting because he has nothing better to do here while he loses.

I have two reasons. 1. I'm bored. 2. If I do win your vote, somehow, it is a vote that won't be helping a non cabal player beat a cabal player.

Also, I vote for Toaster.
 

I believe that the basic disconnect is that you think he wants to lose. I do not think that is the case, I believe he wants to win but wants to help others more. I do not think he would have a issue with you voting for him.

I think you got it right. I'm not aiming to lose. I just want to help my fellow cabal members win more than I want to. If I have to volunteer to lose to help them, so be it. I don't mind losing. And like I said, if Pandar's vote is on me, it won't be on a non cabal player and helping them beat a cabal member.

[ToonyMan]

That's against the whole nature of the game.
Armok

[Diablous]

That's against the whole nature of the game.

If it makes you feel any better, my explanation has virtually guarenteed that I won't get Pandar's vote.