Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 210 211 [212] 213 214 ... 342

Author Topic: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page  (Read 1610209 times)

nil

  • Bay Watcher
  • whoa
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3165 on: January 24, 2011, 10:55:53 pm »

Honestly, I hope Toady doesn't bother with light any time soon.  I just don't see it bringing much to the table, at least not compared to the effort involved for both programmer and player.  Either it doesn't have substantial effects (i.e., creatures can basically see in the dark) in which case you're not doing much more than adding flavor text to the {k} screen, or it does and a person won't be able to mine more than ten squares from the surface without a damn bee industry.  Or maybe you make the dwarves see in the dark (like if cave-adapted) but take it away from surface creatures, which basically would amount to creating an entire new tile dimension solely to create another gimmicky way to kill elves.  Now I'm not opposed to gimmicky ways to kill elves--far from it--but you gotta have the proper priorities.  I hope Bay12 at least finishes the army arc and a dozen or so Eternal Suggestions before they start bothering with lighting..

dennislp3

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3166 on: January 24, 2011, 11:38:39 pm »

Honestly, I hope Toady doesn't bother with light any time soon.  I just don't see it bringing much to the table, at least not compared to the effort involved for both programmer and player.  Either it doesn't have substantial effects (i.e., creatures can basically see in the dark) in which case you're not doing much more than adding flavor text to the {k} screen, or it does and a person won't be able to mine more than ten squares from the surface without a damn bee industry.  Or maybe you make the dwarves see in the dark (like if cave-adapted) but take it away from surface creatures, which basically would amount to creating an entire new tile dimension solely to create another gimmicky way to kill elves.  Now I'm not opposed to gimmicky ways to kill elves--far from it--but you gotta have the proper priorities.  I hope Bay12 at least finishes the army arc and a dozen or so Eternal Suggestions before they start bothering with lighting..

I personally wouldn't mind if the current "dig deep til you find the magma sea" or "dig til you see what you want" methods of play were slowed down somehow...wouldnt hurt anything except making you not as invulnerable in many cases
Logged

Flaede

  • Bay Watcher
  • Beware the Moon Creatures.
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3167 on: January 25, 2011, 12:39:49 am »

Honestly, I hope Toady doesn't bother with light any time soon.  I just don't see it bringing much to the table, at least not compared to the effort involved for both programmer and player.  Either it doesn't have substantial effects (i.e., creatures can basically see in the dark) in which case you're not doing much more than adding flavor text to the {k} screen, or it does and a person won't be able to mine more than ten squares from the surface without a damn bee industry.  Or maybe you make the dwarves see in the dark (like if cave-adapted) but take it away from surface creatures, which basically would amount to creating an entire new tile dimension solely to create another gimmicky way to kill elves.  Now I'm not opposed to gimmicky ways to kill elves--far from it--but you gotta have the proper priorities.  I hope Bay12 at least finishes the army arc and a dozen or so Eternal Suggestions before they start bothering with lighting..

I personally wouldn't mind if the current "dig deep til you find the magma sea" or "dig til you see what you want" methods of play were slowed down somehow...wouldnt hurt anything except making you not as invulnerable in many cases

You could make inferior tallow candles instead. Or fat or oil burning lamps.
Logged
Toady typically doesn't do things by half measures.  As evidenced by turning "make hauling work better" into "implement mine carts with physics".
There are many issues with this statement.
[/quote]

Mel_Vixen

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hobby: accidently thread derailment
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3168 on: January 25, 2011, 12:54:31 am »

or just light a dry stick on fire. I know that firs actualy burn very well - to good actually that stuff got me almost blown up but thats another story.
Logged
[sarcasm] You know what? I love grammar Nazis! They give me that warm and fuzzy feeling. I am so ashamed of my bad english and that my first language is German. [/sarcasm]

Proud to be a Furry.

Kogut

  • Bay Watcher
  • Next account: Bulwersator
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3169 on: January 25, 2011, 01:17:27 am »

Making light CPU efficient is (IMHO) way too time consuming to do it now, before bugfixing, caravan arc, military arcs, eternal suggestions...
Logged
The worst bug - 34.11 poll
Tired of going decades without goblin sieges? Try The Fortress Defense Mod
Kogut, the Bugfixes apostle of Bay12forum. Every posts he makes he preaches about the evil of Bugs.

abadidea

  • Bay Watcher
  • [IS_8BIT_PROGRAMMER]
    • View Profile
    • 0xabad1dea
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3170 on: January 25, 2011, 01:45:25 am »

Don't dwarves have IR vision anyway? That should alleviate the need for a while  :P
Logged
ABadIdea likes bandfire opal, black opal, claro opal, crystal opal, fire opal, harlequin opal, jelly opal, levin opal, pinfire opal, precious fire opal, red flash opal, white opal, and microcline for its vibrant hue.

glory in the thunder, resplendent in the sky <-- I wrote a whole novel. There will be more.

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3171 on: January 25, 2011, 03:06:23 am »

Honestly, I hope Toady doesn't bother with light any time soon.  I just don't see it bringing much to the table, at least not compared to the effort involved for both programmer and player.  Either it doesn't have substantial effects (i.e., creatures can basically see in the dark) in which case you're not doing much more than adding flavor text to the {k} screen, or it does and a person won't be able to mine more than ten squares from the surface without a damn bee industry.  Or maybe you make the dwarves see in the dark (like if cave-adapted) but take it away from surface creatures, which basically would amount to creating an entire new tile dimension solely to create another gimmicky way to kill elves.  Now I'm not opposed to gimmicky ways to kill elves--far from it--but you gotta have the proper priorities.  I hope Bay12 at least finishes the army arc and a dozen or so Eternal Suggestions before they start bothering with lighting..

As discussed in the linked thread about lighting, it could affect various things.

Such as workshop qualities, combat, sneaking detections, noble demands, room values, and plant growth.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

LoSboccacc

  • Bay Watcher
  • Σὺν Ἀθηνᾷ καὶ χεῖρα κίνει
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3172 on: January 25, 2011, 03:08:05 am »

Honestly, I hope Toady doesn't bother with light any time soon.  I just don't see it bringing much to the table, at least not compared to the effort involved for both programmer and player.  Either it doesn't have substantial effects (i.e., creatures can basically see in the dark) in which case you're not doing much more than adding flavor text to the {k} screen, or it does and a person won't be able to mine more than ten squares from the surface without a damn bee industry.  Or maybe you make the dwarves see in the dark (like if cave-adapted) but take it away from surface creatures, which basically would amount to creating an entire new tile dimension solely to create another gimmicky way to kill elves.  Now I'm not opposed to gimmicky ways to kill elves--far from it--but you gotta have the proper priorities.  I hope Bay12 at least finishes the army arc and a dozen or so Eternal Suggestions before they start bothering with lighting..

As discussed in the linked thread about lighting, it could affect various things.

Such as workshop qualities, combat, sneaking detections, noble demands, room values, and plant growth.

and another gimmicky way to kill elves

seriously, why disdain that?
Logged

ShadeJS

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3173 on: January 25, 2011, 08:24:17 am »

Quote from: abadidea link=topic=60554.msg1912159#msg1912159 [/quote
1.6ghz 3-core to 3.0ghz 2-core. I am still keeping the old computer actually since it's still only a year old and pretty great. It's just that my dad got a promotion and all  :D :D :D

But before that I had the same 2.8ghz mono pentium 4 for five whole years. It ran DF mighty fast.

Moving from a one core 3ghz machine to a two core 3ghz (with 2.5 x the bus speed, and faster RAM) was great for me. DF gets one core, the rest of the system, a web browser, and whatever libraries DF is taking to gets the other. People always talk about core speed and DF, but the impact of a fast low latency bus with fast low latency RAM really shouldn't be overlooked.

My single biggest issue is that I half live at my girlfriends place, and all I have there is a 1.6ghz P4 with 512MB of RAM on a Lenovo laptop. That's what Dungeon Crawl is for. :)
Logged

LoSboccacc

  • Bay Watcher
  • Σὺν Ἀθηνᾷ καὶ χεῖρα κίνει
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3174 on: January 25, 2011, 08:41:43 am »

Quote from: abadidea link=topic=60554.msg1912159#msg1912159 [/quote
1.6ghz 3-core to 3.0ghz 2-core. I am still keeping the old computer actually since it's still only a year old and pretty great. It's just that my dad got a promotion and all  :D :D :D

But before that I had the same 2.8ghz mono pentium 4 for five whole years. It ran DF mighty fast.

Moving from a one core 3ghz machine to a two core 3ghz (with 2.5 x the bus speed, and faster RAM) was great for me. DF gets one core, the rest of the system, a web browser, and whatever libraries DF is taking to gets the other. People always talk about core speed and DF, but the impact of a fast low latency bus with fast low latency RAM really shouldn't be overlooked.

My single biggest issue is that I half live at my girlfriends place, and all I have there is a 1.6ghz P4 with 512MB of RAM on a Lenovo laptop. That's what Dungeon Crawl is for. :)

I've a long lasting fortress running at 5 fps and the other core is for a brand new fortress! yay!
Logged

Caldfir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3175 on: January 25, 2011, 11:32:22 am »

I personally wouldn't mind if the current "dig deep til you find the magma sea" or "dig til you see what you want" methods of play were slowed down somehow...wouldn't hurt anything except making you not as invulnerable in many cases

I agree about this.  There has been a loss of pacing in dwarf mode since the .31 release.  I don't know if lighting is the best solution to this, but in my mind there should be something stopping the player from just drilling down to hit magma at embark.  I'm not saying it is a difficulty issue or anything, just pacing - in 40d there was usually a long period of searching for magma that held back the metal industry until completed, and it was pretty fun. 
Logged
where is up?

Sizik

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3176 on: January 25, 2011, 12:46:25 pm »

I personally wouldn't mind if the current "dig deep til you find the magma sea" or "dig til you see what you want" methods of play were slowed down somehow...wouldn't hurt anything except making you not as invulnerable in many cases

I agree about this.  There has been a loss of pacing in dwarf mode since the .31 release.  I don't know if lighting is the best solution to this, but in my mind there should be something stopping the player from just drilling down to hit magma at embark.  I'm not saying it is a difficulty issue or anything, just pacing - in 40d there was usually a long period of searching for magma that held back the metal industry until completed, and it was pretty fun.

But that long period of searching was often done in the site finder, rather than in-game.
Logged
Skyscrapes, the Tower-Fortress, finally complete!
Skyscrapes 2, repelling the zombie horde!

hermes

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3177 on: January 25, 2011, 12:53:27 pm »

I personally wouldn't mind if the current "dig deep til you find the magma sea" or "dig til you see what you want" methods of play were slowed down somehow...wouldn't hurt anything except making you not as invulnerable in many cases

I agree about this.  There has been a loss of pacing in dwarf mode since the .31 release.  I don't know if lighting is the best solution to this, but in my mind there should be something stopping the player from just drilling down to hit magma at embark.  I'm not saying it is a difficulty issue or anything, just pacing - in 40d there was usually a long period of searching for magma that held back the metal industry until completed, and it was pretty fun.

Good point about the pacing, I think the caves provide a nice diversion on the way down, but yes, something would be good to slow down the rate of development as things stand.  For some reason, the low tech beginnings of each fortress is the high point of gameplay for me.

The lighting thread is horrendously overlooked IMO, and as a potential fortress mode feature I think it stands to change the game for the better in a dramatic way.  However I do agree with nil on the technical issues, not least because I think they are twofold; the intersection of lighting and pathfinding is a veritable nightmare of DF underbelly-programming and I wouldn't blame Toady for putting that off for some time.

Bees and the new animals really shall be awesome.  I really can't wait for the caravan arc to make an appearance... things are on the verge of getting really epic in DF. :)
Logged
We can only guess at the longing of the creator. Someone who would need to create one such as you. - A Computer
I've been working on this type of thing...

Greiger

  • Bay Watcher
  • Reptilian Illuminati member. Keep it secret.
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3178 on: January 25, 2011, 01:02:05 pm »

Things have been messy lately -- last few days, including today, are going to be marred running around trying to fix up Zach's broken computer, and I'm sitting on a hundred emails.  I should have a beekeeping devlog up within the hour though.  A vacation would be nice, and I'll announce it if I finally get a chance for one, he he he.

Probably way too late and old news but I wonder how many computer techs live in Washington that would happily fix the Adams' computers at cost, if not just completely for free.


Although it would probably be very hard to resist searching through the computer for a dev version, or hooking the drive up to a tech station with a data recovery program to look for deleted dev versions... 

Huh... I probably single-handedly convinced Toady to never take his computer to a tech shop.
Logged
Disclaimer: Not responsible for dwarven deaths from the use or misuse of this post.
Quote
I don't need friends!! I've got knives!!!

Mel_Vixen

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hobby: accidently thread derailment
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress: The Development Page
« Reply #3179 on: January 25, 2011, 01:07:15 pm »

yeah not to mention that they could find my keylogger on that pc ... umm i shouldnt have said that right?
Logged
[sarcasm] You know what? I love grammar Nazis! They give me that warm and fuzzy feeling. I am so ashamed of my bad english and that my first language is German. [/sarcasm]

Proud to be a Furry.
Pages: 1 ... 210 211 [212] 213 214 ... 342