A little bit of thought means that your first comment more or less repeated what I said. A vampire wouldn't mutilate the victim.
Anyways, I'm going to give my knowledge, rather than thoughts.
A shadowy figure offered me power (a one-shot ability) for a small price(my soul), so I took the power(I chose a night-kill) and killed Toaster with it. He was the one who gave me my power.
...
My soul is the possession of a scum character (albeit a dead one)
Ok well I don't want to be pessimistic here but a soulless human sounds a lot like 'monster' which is what we want dead. I'm not saying we should lynch him right away, but if a third kind of kill shows up tonight- well, here's a potential source.
It is also possible that the devil just has to collect X amount of souls, whereupon the soulless lose and the devil wins.
Either way, this information screws up my analysis. It seems unlikely that a recruiter would also have a soul-stealing capability- why have two ways of converting? (Or a secondary victory condition like collect X souls)
So, probably not a devil/demon 'cult'. What we have is (probably):
1)Devil: harvest souls
2)SK
3)Regular scumteam
The only question is which is which; was org a lone demon, killed by a group of [monsters], or was it the other way around? I'm leaning for a demon scumgroup; org was not played up as some sort of huge monster, but just a guy with issues. Demonic possession issues, yes. But not super crazy foaming at the mouth oh gods there are spikes everywhere issues, which characterises a lone killer. Also, if the exterminator is anything to go by, a SK would probably have some advantage other than 'you can kill folks'; a shield (in which case he wouldn't be dead), or some other power (which would probably manifest itself in the death flavour)
JanusTwoFace: I said it yesterday. I maintain it today. Your posts consist mainly of facts and analysis. They are large and many, but lack flair. You feel like scum.
Do you realize that you're doing exactly what you're accusing me of? The first half of your most recent post analyses the flavor text (which has already been done) and the second half is almost defence and mostly comments. So what are you doing differently than I that makes me scum and you not?
I'm sorry.
No. No I am not doing what I am accusing you of. That post does not contain much content, true. And most of the content is bland and factual. But I am not accusing you of a lack of content, or of your content being factual. I am accusing you of posting buckets and buckets of content, almost all of which is bland and factual, making you seem present and active whilst not actually exposing yourself overmuch. Its not exactly what toaster was doing, but it is similar in nature. And lo and behold; he just flipped scum.
JanusTwoFace: I said it yesterday. I maintain it today. Your posts consist mainly of facts and analysis. They are large and many, but lack flair. You feel like scum.
So you're accusing Janus of what, exactly? Analyzing? Posting facts? HOW DARE JANUS POST FACTS, WHAT MORE EVIL ATROCITY COULD POSSIBLY BE DONE?
I am accusing Janus of posting too many facts, to hide the fact that he is not actually hunting for scum all too much.
ToonyMan: It's true. You are going with the infrequent posts of little content, and this is a thing you do when you are scum. And yes, we can't really trust org; and with redwarrior's reveal the odds of a cult are much lower. Why do you insist upon its existence? One might think you are trying to spread misinformation. And do you actually have a reason for voting me?
Mr.Person: Don't be ridiculous. Knowing whether there is a cult or not would be an advantage. Especially since we get rolenames but not descriptions here.