ToonyMan those votes do not look random to me!
...you are kidding, right. Tell me you are kidding.
Please.D:<
-ORG! Why cult, hmm? Do you think the flavour suggests a cult or cult like entity? Also could we please get some coherent english? I know that the 'lazy posts' are your thing, but your thing is also a brilliant way hide in plain sight.
Cult is almost guaranteed.
D:<
Pray explain your reasoning. In sentences. Which combine. Into. A. Pararararagraph. (or even multiple pararagraphs!)
Really? If I were Cult this early, that would make me a Cult Leader. Why in the world would I draw attention to myself if I were a Cult Leader?
This defense is both self-fulfilling and self-defeating, JanusTwoFace. Come on, dude.
Extrapolate.
Like he said, it's WIFOM to the max. "I'm not Cult because would Cult do this?" when, if he is Cult, the answer is yes, though we've no way of knowing that until he dies.
Thank you.
Jeez, guys, Org says cult so let's all fucking rolefish him! Brilliant!
...right. Because Org as a role that knows what the scumteam is would be so stupid as to reveal this. Org is not an idiot. He is just... 'different' in his play-style.
That being said, Mr.Person, you're active lurking scum. You've had three posts. In the first, you have an unclear comment on my comment on Org. Than you say Org is using words he doesn't understand. True, but still passive. Than you agree with ToonyMan and maybe attacking him? I can't even tell.
I'm not sure what you wanted me to do, pounce on people for nothing? I don't play that game, sorry. Outside of RVS, I only vote people if I think they're scum.
M-m-m-muuuuumy!
The boys on the forum waaant me to s-s-s-scuuumhunt!
But I don't wanna-ha-ha-ha!If you can't find a reason to attack anyone (unlikely), attack someone anyway. Pick someone with high blood pressure and attack them for no reason and hope they snap open, revealing the gooey scumminess within.
Also, I can't believe you're accusing ME of active lurking. Redwarrior has posted more and done less.
And this, ladies and gentlescum, is what we call a
textbook deflectionCan anyone tell me if deflection is a scumtell?
That's right! It is.
Speaking of which:
*fondly remembers reaction to Org after Pand's BYOR*
What a useful comment!
Now how the flying fuck is that deflecting?
Legitimately useful, but not for the game. You're just telling Org how stupid he sounded. Good! Does it help you find scum? No!
So you've done nothing yet despite the fact you said you were going to try to be active. Try again. Do better.
So, having already voted (which by your own words means you think someone is scum)- you go on to point out further reasons to vote for redwarrior? Saying 'Speaking of which' makes one think that you got your deflect vote on, and then- speaking of voting for redwarrior- thought up some reasons to vote for him. After voting for him.
Hmm.
Is there a term for looking for anything remotely scummy in someone after you have already decided to vote for them (these 'scumtells' being merely to justify your actions to others rather than to motivate them)? If there isn't, there should be. And if there is,
[That term]Unvote
Vote... Toonyman, I guess.
Now that the Org lynch didn't work out, it's easy to say, it was ”fallacious or a meme”.
BLATANT, BULLSHIT, BANDWAGONNING.
You're saying I was pressuring other people to dog-pile Org so that we lynch him three posts into the game?
...
* ToonyMan throws his hands in the air and storms out.
Noo, I think that he is agreeing with you. Sort of. Passively. Which brings us very neatly to:
SOLIFUGE: It's been said. It merits saying again.
Passive buddying substanceless malarky: What's with that?
PREPOST EDIT:
Toony... I'll buy it. Unvote Toonyman. Calling it a joke's weak, but I can put my vote to better use for now.
Like on Ottofar. You said you'd get serious now. Is that the best serious you have? Put some backbone in your attack if you want it to be taken seriously.
Bah. Couldn't you have waited ten minutes with this post?