...
And there are muslims being murdered by guys like these.
And there are Muslims being murdered by Muslims, there are whites being killed by whites... There are Muslims killing whites... And once more, how can you cleanse an ethnicity if it's not an ethnicity?
The difference between generic murder and murder for the purpose of terroristic intimidation and expulsion of a group of people is that the second represents a grave threat to society while the first does not.
They are cleansing an ethnicity. The ethnicity of non-whites and immigrants. They and you are attempting to create an ethnically pure "English" England. That is the very definition of ethnic cleansing. Period. End of story.
...
Do you have any idea how ridiculous that statement is?
We are fighting racism through enforced segregation and deportation by threats and acts of violence against minorities!
No, it actually works. People have no pretext for racism if they are the same race. Also, see above.
No. It does not actually work. Not at all. The elimination of other races does not remove racism, it is the extreme active institutionalization of that racism. It makes it the fundamental building block of your society. It is an appalling and horrific thing. You are a bigot.
Oh noes, I'm a Bigot. How will I possibly come back from this. I'm not promoting an " Ethnically clean" England. I'm proposing a world with no " Minorities." There will be no minorities. There will be no need for laws to protect them, as they won't be attacked on the street for being of a particular ethnicity. I'm not proposing we kill them. But I'm sorry if I'm harming your small, narrow minded thought patterns. I'll stop if you want.
I like how everyone ignored my comment and kept on bickering. I guess it doesn't fit your vision of a multicultural utopia, eh?
I think your comment was very insightful Yann. Thank you, and I'm sorry I didn't respond.
Why? Multiculturalism ends in.... What? What benefits are there? If people were to clump together, there would be no such thing as " Minorities". People wouldn't have to live in fear of racism. Total segregation hasn't worked because it's never been tried. I'm not saying second-class citizens, I'm saying no need for racism as they don't come into contact.
Peoples attitudes wouldnt change. You would have clumps that hated/feared other clumps as they were different, and violence and war between clumps would be inevitable, as it had throughout human history when people organized themselves along these ethnic or nationalist lines.
Multiculturalism is the best defence against intolerance - over time, as people understand and as a result fear the differences between people less, there is no need for hate. Over the timespan of human history, multiculturalism has not been tried for long (and on occasion has worked in history, though often as a neccesity rather than choice) so to declare it a failure as it has teething problems in its very early days as a widespread entity is IMHO very premature.
I like how everyone ignored my comment and kept on bickering. I guess it doesn't fit your vision of a multicultural utopia, eh?
Oh, nobody was saying that the system in the UK is ideal - it is far from it. We were too busy arguing about the EDL to give much thought to that though, sorry!
It hasn't worked. These aren't teething problems, it just doesn't work. Multiculturalism worked in Australia, until near now. Why? Italians and Germans had a very similar culture. Now, Muslims are campaigning for special Shaira law that only applies to them. That's not multiculturalism, that's bigotry.
In few places had it worked, and only for short times.
Author
Topic: Things that made you RRRRRRAAAAGGGGEEEE today: Trust-o-nomics Edition (Read 3782508 times)