I mean, the recent Buzzfeed list craze hasn't really caused the quality of news to drop. They've just stopped pretending it's respectable. Now the format matches the content.
And it might not be an entirely bad thing! Remember all those news articles that were 50 words of news and 450 words of bullshit to fill space? Now they'll just be a 50 word list and you can dismiss them at a glance!
I'm one of those crazy people who still likes to read news, sometimes in paper format. The format determines a lot about how something is delivered.
And the change to online IMO has lead news to be delivered faster, sexier (an actual term used in the business.) But you also get a ton, an absolute ton, of filler content because not everyone honestly has something worth reporting every moment of every day. They
might, if they were tasked with covering something you can't understand in an hour or less, and deliver in 30 seconds.
So I find the trend of most news articles online being accompanied by video irritating, if it's even got a written article attached to it. The shit starts playing instantly when the page loads, and some talking head is making broadcast speak in my ear. (I learned the artifice of broadcast speak as well. So when I hear it, it kills me because I know the intent is to sound conversational, friendly and usually funny in some way. Which was led to a rash of people saying incredibly stupid shit on live TV because they're basically expected to improv an entire news hour, going one minute from "dat cat video" to talking about hundreds dying in Syria to a chemical weapons attack.)
Also, what you term 450 words of bullshit is context and it's there for the benefit of someone who doesn't know about a story until they pick up that article. Here's a novel idea though; instead of paying someone a salary to write the same article every day and add a new line, pay them to actually fucking report on something. Go somewhere, talk to some people, ask some goddamn questions. I have seen articles online today that are literally yesterday's article, copy/pasted with a new line added. Not unlike a forum or blog post.
When you expect content on the hour, you get an hour's worth of effort in that content. That's what I see reflected in the way things have changed, even since I've gotten out of college. Sometimes it hard to call CNN a news site when a large portion of it is given over to fluff, essentially paid advertisements (the # of stories based solely around product releases has shot through the roof in recent years. CNN is basically a shill for certain products. Some release events you really can't get around as news, like an iPhone release. But when you're suddenly making news out of the fact JayZ makes headphones, something smell rotten.) Media has become very passive, because being active, i.e. sending reporters out to cover complicated stories, is both expensive and increasingly dangerous. So new media has gotten very used to information it can find without leaving the office, or information that's given to them rather than discovered. CNN (who I single out because it's really the only website I go to for news anymore, just to catch important headlines) does occasionally do good journalism on things they care about (environmental/social issues tend to get the most play.) But that's about half of what they do.
About the only thing I think I appreciate about new media is that, sometimes, the right person is in the right place with the right technology and you get news unfiltered by editors, advertising, hype and sometimes even the journalist's self-censoring. Being able to literally put the reader/viewer in the middle of it. But that I think makes up a fraction of what constitutes news right now.
I want a return to the dignity and professionalism of nightly network news. I felt like I could respect these guys and when they spoke it was worth listening to. Sometimes because they had the time to process what was happening and have something to say. Maybe just because familiarity breeds contempt. Either way, I can't listen to the majority of broadcasters now because most of them have been trained to be likable, casual and to deal with the news quickly. When you're dealing with all the insane shit going on in the world today, it's not a time to be glib about it or dedicate just as much time to it as you do to all the frivolous shit people entertain themselves with,
without your help.