Say for instance, a homosexual male couple that desires a baby. The dominant partner provides a sperm sample, the erhm.. supportive?.. partner supplies a tissue sample that has the Y chromosome removed and the X chromosome duplicated, subjected to a hormone bath and cultivated into "Bio ink", and has a full female reproductive system generated artificially to facilitate the gestation.
This procedure is not going to happen, maybe not ever, if someone tries it on animals, but probably never for humans. The first step of that procedure would fuck up the child a lot. Not to mention that as described, the baby would be triploid and thus DoA.
Similar issue arises with clones. Actually for quite similar reasons. Plus, a clone army would require you to have an army already, an army of surrogate mothers, and each clone would have to be born like a plain ol' regular baby, except physiologically fucked up from day zero. RL clones aren't vat-grown, they develop in completely normal uterus of a female of the species they belong to, except the female shares no DNA with the child.
Of course, we were talking artificial uterii, but that in turn would require not just a hormone bath, but carefully monitored mix of hormones, its contents adjusted at least on a daily basis, plus a nutrient mix, PLUS antiviral and antibacterial shielding, so you'd need at least one full-time worker trained in life science. In which case, it's much much simpler, cheaper, more ethical, and effective to just adopt and give up on having your DNA match (especially since it wouldn't anyway).
More science, less sci-fi guys.