Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

7 (50%)

No

0 (0%)

I am not playing.

7 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 14

[Mr.Person]

I'll take that slot.

[quinnr]

Cool beans! I am going to edit a couple rules for the forum setting, and then we will start tomorrow!

ExKirby shall go first.

[ExKirby]

First things first, the scoring system seems a little complex for our needs. My rule is an Ammendment to rule 202:

Kepp the first part of the turn, but remove the dice/fraction scoring and replace it with the following: If your rule passes, you gain 5 points. If it passes unanimously, you gain 10 points.

[quinnr]

Vote away.
Also, I added a immutable rule:

     117. The game shall start when 6 players have signed up. No new players may be added while this rule is in place.

You can change it to mutable and edit it, if you so feel.

[quinnr]

Fixed the thread title. Wake up people!

[Org]

Who starts.

[quinnr]

First things first, the scoring system seems a little complex for our needs. My rule is an Ammendment to rule 202:

Kepp the first part of the turn, but remove the dice/fraction scoring and replace it with the following: If your rule passes, you gain 5 points. If it passes unanimously, you gain 10 points.

ExKirby did start.
We go in the order of sign-ups, although votes should be finished before the next person goes, I think.

Okay, poll is up. We shall try a poll.

[Org]

First things first, the scoring system seems a little complex for our needs. My rule is an Ammendment to rule 202:

Kepp the first part of the turn, but remove the dice/fraction scoring and replace it with the following: If your rule passes, you gain 5 points. If it passes unanimously, you gain 10 points.

Yes.

[quinnr]

If you could answer the poll, it'd help.
:-P

[quinnr]

Just checking, this is an amendment of rule 202.

Also, might want to read the rules 111, 203, and 204 if you don't know them.

[Diakron]

I vote no becuase i think the element of luck makes the game more interesting.

I would be willing to do something like 1d6+2 but won't go for set scores

[ExKirby]

Actually, random scores would make the game infuriating. A person who only just clinches victory could get more points than someone who got full marks. My one makes it fair and simple.

[quinnr]

I guess that amendment has failed.
Next!

[Diakron]

well then maybe 1d6 for getting simple majority, 1d6+2 for 67% and 1d6+4 for 100%

[Diakron]

only 3 votes are cast