Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[cousac]

I've run into a bit of a problem compiling. I'm on openSUSE 11.3

i've run cmake and then i tried to run make and this is what i get:

Code: [Select]

cousac@linux-zwvc:~/Downloads/peterix-dfhack-1cc74b3/build> make
[  1%] Building CXX object library/CMakeFiles/dfhack.dir/DFContext.cpp.o
/home/cousac/Downloads/peterix-dfhack-1cc74b3/library/DFContext.cpp:34:35: fatal error: private/ModuleFactory.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [library/CMakeFiles/dfhack.dir/DFContext.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [library/CMakeFiles/dfhack.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
dunno what to do.

[peterix]

dunno what to do.

Already fixed. I forgot to push the file to github...

[cousac]

dunno what to do.

Already fixed. I forgot to push the file to github...

you sir are a god now to build stone sense :p

[peterix]

Whichever version worked for 31.19. I know for a fact that version 5.1 worked, I think versions 5.2 and 5.3 worked as well, but I'm not sure. Both DF and the tools are running in wine.

Ok. Please stop using DFHack inside wine, the fact that it even worked before was pure luck.

You can, however, use the linux dfhack with wine DF. And I just added an Ubuntu package generator to my build system, so you can grab those from the first post

[_DivideByZero_]

Yay, thanks!

EDIT:
How do i use the tools on linux? I try to run it from a terminal, but I get this error:

Code: [Select]

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'DFHack::Error::NoProcess'
  what():  couldn't find a suitable process
Aborted


[vityav]

Yay, thanks!

EDIT:
How do i use the tools on linux? I try to run it from a terminal, but I get this error:

Code: [Select]

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'DFHack::Error::NoProcess'
  what():  couldn't find a suitable process
Aborted


When I used to get that error, it meant I hadn't started DF (and loaded a map) before running the tools. Trying now with an unsupported version (31.21 linux), it gives me that error too. Are either of those true for you?

[vityav]

Current packages (0.5.8 for DF 31.xx):
Windows tools release
Ubuntu 10.10 32bit
Ubuntu 10.10 64bit

Does this mean there should exist memory offsets for 31.21 linux? I see none
Also, though I'm fairly inexperienced with memory hacking (read: simple scanning for numerical changes), it seems like I saw a quick guide you wrote on it and I'd be happy to help out if my fedora 14 x64 addresses would be of any use.

[peterix]

Yay, thanks!

EDIT:
How do i use the tools on linux? I try to run it from a terminal, but I get this error:

Code: [Select]

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'DFHack::Error::NoProcess'
  what():  couldn't find a suitable process
Aborted


It should be possible to use them with both linux and wine DF. The wine DF versions are better supported, because the offsets are up to date (and should suffer less from weird linux kernel extensions).

Hmm... I haven't tested things much with ubuntu to be honest. Just made sure the packages install properly. Just running df 31.16 on my 10.10 i386 VM, things seem a little wonky. Reveal works, cursor position doesn't... weird. I can see automated testing on the horizon

Does this mean there should exist memory offsets for 31.21 linux? I see none
Also, though I'm fairly inexperienced with memory hacking (read: simple scanning for numerical changes), it seems like I saw a quick guide you wrote on it and I'd be happy to help out if my fedora 14 x64 addresses would be of any use.

It means nothing. The linux support is the same it was before. There are just some packages for Ubuntu. I was reworking the build system and figured adding support for building those automatically can't be that hard (I was wrong and spent a few hours bashing my head against a wall, but whatever ... ).

Help is always appreciated. I'm not familiar with fedora all that much, but it can't be too different. Make sure you grab some decent tools and use the git HEAD of dfhack.
As long as you stick to the linux stuff, you won't have to do much voodoo wizardry with debuggers Stop by in the irc channel (#dfhack on freenode).

[freeformschooler]

Peterix I hate cross asking but I figured I would get a better response here. I remember that a couple of versions ago (maybe the version in which ghosts were introduced), making the current adventurer "ghostly" would give them godly walk-through-walls abilities. Now all it does is make them able to fly and other silly ghostly things. Am I doing something wrong, or has this been removed from DF in the first place, or was this a removed feature of DFusion?

[peterix]

I remember that a couple of versions ago, making the current adventurer "ghostly" would give them godly walk-through-walls abilities. Now all it does is make them able to fly and other silly ghostly things.

My guess is Toady removed the walking through walls thing because it was causing a lot of lag from excessive pathfinding.

[freeformschooler]

Ahh, thanks for that response. I had figured it was a debug feature left in but that WOULD make more sense, hehe

[Rumrusher]

Ahh, thanks for that response. I had figured it was a debug feature left in but that WOULD make more sense, hehe

Wait pathing through walls was only done if you where naked something about having items on solidify you. I haven't checked out .21 version but yeah naked = no clip.
 edit. yeah it still works in .21

[cousac]

Hey Mr. peterix

Question: When are you planning to make the CMakeList.txt for the python bindings? I'd very much like to use it to make a visualizer via Panda3d...

[peterix]

When are you planning to make the CMakeList.txt for the python bindings?

When the stars are right ...

Soon, I hope. It requires a bit of research into how python modules have to be installed (and testing).

[Uristocrat]

I remember that a couple of versions ago, making the current adventurer "ghostly" would give them godly walk-through-walls abilities. Now all it does is make them able to fly and other silly ghostly things.

My guess is Toady removed the walking through walls thing because it was causing a lot of lag from excessive pathfinding.

I honestly wonder why they were path finding, though.  If you can walk through everything, can't you just travel in a straight line?

Basically, something akin to:
if (u.pos.x < target.x) next.x++;
if (u.pos.x > target.x) next.x--;
if (u.pos.y < target.y) next.y++;
if (u.pos.y > target.y) next.y--;
if (u.pos.z < target.z) next.z++;
if (u.pos.z > target.z) next.z--;
u.pos = next;