This scenario we're in is perfect. Both me and Lonewolf will eat lynch. That'll drag us down to 6p with 2 scum. Nightkill reduces us to 5p lylo territory. If scum had a lylo breaker, they'd have busted it out yesterday along with Lonewolf. The only sad part is that when Lonewolf flips scum, I'd be confirmed town. Thus I'd actually rather have a Lonewolf + Jokerman lynch, but I guess you can't win them all.
What the fuck, SirBayer? Why are you protecting Lonewolf? I was already going to be lynched, all you're doing is saving Lonewolf. Why did you wait til the end of the goddamn day to mention that you still suspected me? As far as I'm concerned, you're bringing this out of nowhere with no evidence trying to end the day really fast so you don't have to fucking explain yourself. Good show, you just moved from the most town to second scummiest. Oh, and no matter what alignment you have, fuck you for trying to pull a fast one.
But hey, I'd be more than willing to vote Jokerman with you. I've never lost my suspicion of him. And even though I think you're now scummier than him, I still think he needs to hang.
Well, aside from making deals with scum being something incredibly dangerous to do during milo, you're coming off as desperate to not be lynched on your own.
You were perfectly fine when it was both you and Lonewolf I on the chopping block, but now all of a sudden you have a problem. The prospect of gaining nothing with today's lynch scaring you?
Yeah, you're scum. This completely seals it, beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Thanks, Jim. There's nothing more to say on this one, except for: Hey, look at the bolded section. The natural hypocrisy. "I can change my mind because of one post, but Bayer's not allowed to do that."
You idiot, I don't want to be lynched alone because that would mean the game ends and I lose. HERP DERP.
It's also that just lynching me makes no fucking sense whatsoever. The only risk of lynching both me and Lonewolf (or Jokerman, but Lonewolf is a better lynch) is if both of us are town, and I'm pretty fucking sure Lonewolf is scum. We both claim to have lylo breakers, so even if the rest of the town has a rabbit in it's ass to pull out, the scum would still win anyways.
Hey, let me enlighten you on something:
I don't think Lonewolf is scum. Why the
fuck would I be interested in helping you hammer someone I have no reason to suspect is anything but a townie?
And before you start flinging scum evidence at me, I've seen it. Looks a hell of a lot like newtells to me.
Not what I was saying at all.
Good scum know how to make reasonable arguments to justify their votes. Mr. Person in the last Vote Mafia showed that he knows how to play a very good scum game, so it's no surprise that his votes on Org and ToonyMan appeared to be well-justified at the time.
However, Mr. Person is hiding behind his arguments for those two votes as if their strength and validity are the only things determining whether he is suspicious or not. And that is simply not true, otherwise, why demand that I disprove his arguments first before attacking him on other things?
There are many reasons to suspect Mr. Person, and all I have to do to show Mr. Person is scum is bring those reasons to light, as I've already done. I don't have to play his game and prove his arguments false before I make any further attack.
There's more to consider when determining if someone is scum than just the reasons they use to vote. Obviously.
"Appeared" to be well-justified? You're implying they weren't while making no effort to prove that they weren't. So, do you think my arguments on Organd ToonyMan scumminess are right?
Let me get this straight. You think that I, as scum, jumped onto Org and ToonyMan because they were easy. That's fine. The problem is that actually happened and it doesn't prove a fucking thing about my alignment. Why should I have looked past Org and ToonyMan to find more scum? Their actions were scummy. They refused to change their actions. Nobody else really stood out. Voting for Org and ToonyMan at the time were the big obvious scum. Going after anybody else were, at best, small hard-to-notice mafia... and I would of just voted for Org and ToonyMan later anyways.
So since the argument was correct and me using the argument isn't fundamentally scummy, there must obviously be some facet that's making you think I'm scummy. You claim it's the laziness, I'm saying the laziness is very justifiable here. AFAIK, this is your only argument, and it sucks. You might probably have more, but they're buried a few pages back. Could you dredge them back up, please?
Org and ToonyMan were easy lynches because they were acting really scummy. If you had a problem with their lynches, you should of brought it up while they were still alive. You didn't. In fact, you voted for ToonyMan. So don't you dare try and attack me for "going after easy lynches" without first proving my arguments invalid. And it's too late, because even if you did poke a giant hole into my arguments, I couldn't change my vote at this point anyways.
Hey, look at who just admitted to going after easy lynches?
You know what the problem with easy lynches is, Mr. Person? That they're easy. You were just riding the easytrain to Lynchville, but now the goddamn Marshall's on the train and HE'S FUCKING PISSED.
YOU WERE ON BOTH OF THE "EASY" LYNCHES. You're not even
trying.