Nice bus.
Y'see, this is making me think you're scum again. A passive accusation with nothing to back it up, and no followup.
No shit, Sherlocke.
I can only suspect that you're bussing your partner. I don't have any evidence to support this suspicion, aside from the general feeling I get that your scum team is a sinking ship and voting to lynch Jokerman-EXE is about the only thing you can do to salvage it.
But I guess that ship has sailed.So the only thing I can do is throw it out there. I can't ask you, "Hey, are you bussing your partner?" since that would never get me a useful answer.
Bullshit. If we lynch town today, we instantly lose. Unless you're pushing No Lynch, you should be pushing a massclaim. Heck, even pushing No Lynch today is dumb due to the possibility of mafia voting roles.
Whoa, it's milo? No kidding!
A mass claim at this point is still useless. I've forced mass claims in previous Vote Mafias and it didn't help pick out who was scum.
This is not a game of Paranormal with roleblockers and guards and redirectors and all the other power roles that make it easy to pick out lying scum during a mass claim. We would get everybody's role but we would still be in
the same boat as we are now, and would look to the evidence that we are already looking at to make up our minds.
These words are wasted on you because you just want a mass claim so you and your scum buddies can pick out Double Voters and Vote Motivators and any other role that can screw up lylo for you.
And what, pray tell, makes you think that? Those are all very broad and general accusations to make, most of which are difficult to prove or disprove.
Tell me, how do Toaster's posts lack content, specifically? How about his most recent post? Does that lack content?
Scumbuddies. Good to know. I'll address your point along with Toaster's near identical qualms later.
As a sidenote - "difficult to prove or disprove"? What? It's as easy to prove or disprove as any other accusation.
Mmhmm. Two people find your attack lacking and the only explanation is they are scum protecting each other. Yes, that makes sense.
And hey, didn't you just say that you thought I was scum for the way I threw out passive accusations without anything backing them up? I'm pretty sure you did. Here, let me quote you.
Nice bus.
Y'see, this is making me think you're scum again. A passive accusation with nothing to back it up, and no followup.
Amazing how this works. Of course, hypocrisy really isn't a scum tell. I'm just being an ass right now.
It's pretty easy to say somebody's posts lack content, regardless of whether they do or not. And it's easy enough to use it as a justification for a vote. The reason it's difficult to prove or disprove is that if anybody challenges you, well, you can just disagree with them. You'd be lying, of course, but they can't argue with you over a matter of opinion and interpretation.
Evidence and Toaster's last post
Your evidence is very selective. Almost all of it from Day 1, most of the material and reasons I suspected Toaster at the time. It's disingenuous to suspect Toaster for those reasons while at the same time ignoring all his much more substantial posts during Days 2 and 3.
And this is another reason I suspect you. You're not being nearly as reasonable as you should be, while you're stubbornly holding onto suspicions that aren't valid but nobody can argue with. A very common scum tactic; it's happened in tons of games and I've even done it myself once or twice.
And about Toaster's last post: I guess I should have picked a better example.
Author
Topic: Vote Mafia 7 - Game Over: Mafia Wins! (Read 45790 times)