Chainsaw and completely ignoring a post other than one error.
Almost his entire case was based on one bussing the other. I think it's a fair question to ask.
Now I feel we are getting somewhere. This is wrong what you say there. Wrong. The main point of his case was that he was reacting twitchy. The busing was only a side thing, a very small side thing.
OMGUS
I gave my reason - it's not OMGUS. And I don't see how you can use OMGUS as a scumtell in this situation anyway.
You entire point was based on a lie, that all he was doing was busing "I think it's a fair question to ask." You are a hypocrite even more now, good job.
Really it was a OMGUS, I asked you why you would do that (which I have now learned is called chainsawing) so you flip your shit and vote me.
Ignoring the point of what I said and putting words in my mouth.
I don't see how I put words into your mouth - you said nuke was "obviously scum", and then voted me for not picking up on this. If you feel this isn't a fair summary, please correct it.
Okay I will. I said nuke was "obviously scum", and then voted you for chainsaw and ignoring arguments. Then you misrepresent somewhat why I am voting for you. Than you go on to say I don't even think nuke is scum, I never said that ever, ever. EVER. That is putting words in my mouth.
Literally no content in our argument, you seem to just dismiss me and ignore everything I say.
Your first point had you apparently not wanting to lynch scum. I didn't understand the second thing you said at all.
Wut.
I say I want to lynch him
AND YOU TAKE THAT TO MEAN I DON'T WANT TO LYNCH HIM!?!
The second point was me saying that he is scum.
Putting words in my mouth again, and ignoring me again, great.
Hyperbole, perhaps, but again, I don't see "Putting words in your mouth" anywhere. I didn't fully understand your first point (and in any case, I don't let players escape on a deflectionary basis) and the second thing you said was so wrong I couldn't respond to it at all.
You said I was saying that you should attack nuke and not me, therefor putting words into my mouth. The second thing was the base of my argument, you are attacking someone on one thing well ignoring all other things from that person.
Your argument remains fundamentally broken. You are saying I am scum with Nuke - if Nuke is not scum, your case comes to absolutely nothing. Logically, you would be pushing to get Nuke lynched today (attacking me too, sure, but Nuke would have to be the one you'd push).
You defense remains fundamentally broken. You are saying I don't think Nuke is scum. Wrong. I want you our nuke to be lynched today, you are just seem that much more scummier to me and therefor I am voting you and by arguing with you trying to get others to vote you. I don't see why It is better to lynch one scum other the other when the scum I am trying to lynch seems easier to lynch. How about I push to get you lynched today (attacking Nuke too, sure, but you would be the one I push).