Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Mr.Person]

Good job, Lonewolf! Way to try and force Toaster into a "this-or-that" scenario, the easiest to spot logical fallacy in existence. You can't even justify it since your argument is that we've both gotten lots of inspections... but inspections happen before we can talk. Org got a lot of inspections since he's the hardest player to read, bar none. I got a lot of inspections since when the game began, I was the most experienced player (no offense to anybody else). Experienced players always get chosen for actions for some reason, I have no idea why.

Explain to me why being inspected before the first day by other players who had NOTHING to go on is grounds for a lynching? And why are you trying to force Toaster into lynching one of us? You've not said either of us was scummy, so what's with the sudden hate?

[webadict]

Okay, I'll unvote.

We might as well pick a player to have everyone scan. It'll be a double lynch of sorts, and give us the most information we can get.

We're gonna double lynch, while at the same time hoping for a neutral death. Post your choice for the double lynch in asterisks (I have no color on my phone.)

Such as this: *abc_latter2*

[Org]

Mr Person, why do you say that you have no idea why experienced players get chosen for actions?
Really?

[Criptfeind]

Mr. P

Are you in fact saying that he was incorrect when he said that if it was to come down to lynching to find out info you or org would not be the best?

[RedWarrior0]

Still want the extensionization?

[webadict]

Yeah kinda. We got a nice chat going.

[Toaster]

Jokerman:  You're doing a great job of lurking, with your two whole posts.  You said we should try something else, and said you didn't like a no lynch, but you didn't suggest any alternatives.  Why don't you actually contribute instead of standing in the background?

Holy Hell, Toaster, how hard can it be? I don't like a no-lynch, therefore my suggestion is...LYNCH DURP DURP. I didn't realize I needed to spell that out for you. Were you expecting me to suggest a half-lynch?

*sigh*

Yes, duh, lynch, but lynch WHOM?  I don't see you offering suggestions, or even trying to find out someone scummy to string up.  All I see is you watching the action.

Lonewolf:  *sigh*

Web:  I agree that one day's worth of inspections is pretty much useless.  As far as using our inspect as a pseduo-lynch, remember that doesn't help us figure out who the poisoner is, which could be a lylo issue.  Right now, if we go after anyone, I'd say Jokerman unless he actually does something helpful.  I'm keeping my vote on no-lynch for the time being until I decide which is best, but I'm leaning on NL due to it being a 10p game, despite the poisoner.

Cript:  Who would you lynch for maximum information?  Who would you lynch for maximum scumminess?

[Criptfeind]

Who would I lynch for maximum gain? Hum.... Well no one is feeling very scummy to me right now. I would say Org because of all the confusion around him. Or Mr P for the same reason.

Obviously both are bad ideas.

Still want the extensionization?

Sure. extension.

[Lonewolf I]

Good job, Lonewolf! Way to try and force Toaster into a "this-or-that" scenario, the easiest to spot logical fallacy in existence. You can't even justify it since your argument is that we've both gotten lots of inspections... but inspections happen before we can talk. Org got a lot of inspections since he's the hardest player to read, bar none. I got a lot of inspections since when the game began, I was the most experienced player (no offense to anybody else). Experienced players always get chosen for actions for some reason, I have no idea why.

Explain to me why being inspected before the first day by other players who had NOTHING to go on is grounds for a lynching? And why are you trying to force Toaster into lynching one of us? You've not said either of us was scummy, so what's with the sudden hate?

I'm not forcing anyone into anything, nor is there any hate involved.  You two are the logical choices if we're going to lynch purely for information simply because you happened to attract more inspections than anyone else.

Unvote.  Extension.

Webadict - Would you explain your plan in a bit more detail?  I don't quite understand it.

[Double A]

Double A:  You didn't answer my question.

Double A, what do you think the best plan for scanning is?

You're posting, but without content.

Sorry, I didn't see it. And I tend to do that in mafia games where I don't have anything to say.

Anyway, to answer your question, I think we should do it in pairs so we have a better chance of correct results.

[webadict]

My plan involves hiding the poisoner for one night while simultaneously creating a double lynch using said poisoner's powers. This will also give people the same inspect person to work with coinciding the inspects with one another.

Basically your standard multi-tiered plan.

[Criptfeind]

Ohhhh I get it now. Okay then. Lets do that.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Jokerman - Would you rather lynch Mr. Person or Org if we're going to be lynching for info?  I assume they're the main choices since each got three inspections.

If it had to be one of the two? I'd say Org, but that's because I never understand what he's doing. Mr.Person is more useful in that I can actually follow his thoughts.

That said, I don't necessarily think it has to be one of those two.

Jokerman:  You're doing a great job of lurking, with your two whole posts.  You said we should try something else, and said you didn't like a no lynch, but you didn't suggest any alternatives.  Why don't you actually contribute instead of standing in the background?

Holy Hell, Toaster, how hard can it be? I don't like a no-lynch, therefore my suggestion is...LYNCH DURP DURP. I didn't realize I needed to spell that out for you. Were you expecting me to suggest a half-lynch?

*sigh*

Yes, duh, lynch, but lynch WHOM?  I don't see you offering suggestions, or even trying to find out someone scummy to string up.  All I see is you watching the action.

Lonewolf:  *sigh*

Web:  I agree that one day's worth of inspections is pretty much useless.  As far as using our inspect as a pseduo-lynch, remember that doesn't help us figure out who the poisoner is, which could be a lylo issue.  Right now, if we go after anyone, I'd say Jokerman unless he actually does something helpful.  I'm keeping my vote on no-lynch for the time being until I decide which is best, but I'm leaning on NL due to it being a 10p game, despite the poisoner.

Cript:  Who would you lynch for maximum information?  Who would you lynch for maximum scumminess?

1. I'm watching in order to determine who to lynch. You know - standard play for me.

2. You agree with Web when I said the exact same thing, and then point a finger at me and claim that I'm not being helpful. I sense a fallacy there.

You're suspicious. Unvote for now, and Toaster will be the object of my suspicions after the Night if we're all set on a NL.

[Toaster]

Jokerman:  There's no fallacy- you are being unhelpful.  I'm questioning your actions, not your words.   Web's planning, poking, prodding- you're waffling over options without proposing any sort of solution.  Go question people and try to make them squirm if you've got nothing else. 

Just like Double A should be doing if he's got nothing.

[webadict]

Quite. We shoould either prod the quiet people, or lynch them should they not respond.